Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35183231›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

Evaluation of anti-malaria potency of wild and genetically modified Enterobacter cloacae expressing effector proteins in Anopheles stephensi.

Hossein Dehghan, Seyed Hassan Mosa-Kazemi, Bagher Yakhchali, Naseh Maleki-Ravasan, Hassan Vatandoost, Mohammad Ali Oshaghi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Environmental persistence and transmission dynamics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessing Survival of Transgenic Bacteria,Journal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Co-infection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hossein DehghanDepartment of Public Health, School of Public Health, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran.
Seyed Hassan Mosa-KazemiDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. moosakazemi@tums.ac.ir.
Bagher YakhchaliDepartment Industrial and of Environmental Biotechnology, National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Tehran, Iran.
Naseh Maleki-RavasanMalaria and Vector Research Group, Biotechnology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Hassan VatandoostDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Ali OshaghiDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. moshaghi@sina.tums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3004-0364
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRNational Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · IRPasteur Institute of Iran · IRUniversity of Jiroft · IR

Funding

National Institute for Medical Research Development 943677Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services 26231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria is one of the most lethal infectious diseases in tropical and subtropical areas of the world. Paratransgenesis using symbiotic bacteria offers a sustainable and environmentally friendly strategy to combat this disease. In the study reported here, we evaluated the disruption of malaria transmission in the Anopheles stephensi-Plasmodium berghei assemblage using the wild-type (WT) and three modified strains of the insect gut bacterium, Enterobacter cloacae.

methodsThe assay was carried out using the E. cloacae dissolvens WT and three engineered strains (expressing green fluorescent protein-defensin (GFP-D), scorpine-HasA (S-HasA) and HasA only, respectively). Cotton wool soaked in a solution of 5% (wt/vol) fructose + red dye (1/50 ml) laced with one of the bacterial strains (1 × 10

resultsExposure to both WT and genetically modified E. cloacae dissolvens strains significantly (P < 0.0001) disrupted P. berghei development in the midgut of An. stephensi, in comparison with the control group. The mean parasite inhibition of E. cloacae

conclusionsThe WT and modified strains of E. cloacae have the potential to abolish oocyst development by providing a physical barrier or through the excretion of intrinsic effector molecules. These findings reinforce the case for the use of either WT or genetically modified strains of E. cloacae bacteria as a powerful tool to combat malaria.

Indexed as

AnophelesAntimalarialsMalariaAnimalsEnterobacter cloacaeFemaleMicePlasmodium bergheiAntimalarialsAnopheles stephensiDefensinEnterobacter cloacaeMalariaParatransgenesisScorpine

Identifiers

PMID35183231
PMCPMC8858508
OpenAlexW4225351763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.