Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35183230›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2022

First responder systems can stay operational under pandemic conditions: results of a European survey during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Camilla Metelmann, Bibiana Metelmann, Michael P Müller, Bernd W Böttiger, Georg Trummer, Karl Christian Thies

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biosafety Issues in Patient Transport during COVID-19: A Case Study on the Portuguese Emergency Services.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla MetelmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch Straße 1, 17475, Greifswald, Germany. camilla.metelmann@uni-greifswald.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-9021
Bibiana MetelmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch Straße 1, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Michael P MüllerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, St. Josefskrankenhaus, Sautierstraße 1, 79104, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Bernd W BöttigerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Köln, Germany.
Georg TrummerDepartment of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Cardiac Centre Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Karl Christian ThiesKlinik für Anästhesiologie, EvKB, Universitätsklinikum OWL der Universität Bielefeld, Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Burgsteig 13, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEBielefeld University · DESt. Josefskrankenhaus Freiburg · DEUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDispatching first responders (FR) to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in addition to the emergency medical service has shown to increase survival. The promising development of FR systems over the past years has been challenged by the outbreak of COVID-19. Whilst increased numbers and worse outcomes of cardiac arrests during the pandemic suggest a need for expansion of FR schemes, appropriate risk management is required to protect first responders and patients from contracting COVID-19. This study investigated how European FR schemes were affected by the pandemic and what measures were taken to protect patients and responders from COVID-19.

methodsTo identify FR schemes in Europe we conducted a literature search and a web search. The schemes were contacted and invited to answer an online questionnaire during the second wave of the pandemic (December 2020/ January 2021) in Europe.

resultsWe have identified 135 FR schemes in 28 countries and included responses from 47 FR schemes in 16 countries. 25 schemes reported deactivation due to COVID-19 at some point, whilst 22 schemes continued to operate throughout the pandemic. 39 schemes communicated a pandemic-specific algorithm to their first responders. Before the COVID-19 outbreak 20 FR systems did not provide any personal protective equipment (PPE). After the outbreak 19 schemes still did not provide any PPE. The majority of schemes experienced falling numbers of accepted call outs and decreasing registrations of new volunteers. Six schemes reported of FR having contracted COVID-19 on a mission.

conclusionsEuropean FR schemes were considerably affected by the pandemic and exhibited a range of responses to protect patients and responders. Overall, FR schemes saw a decrease in activity, which was in stark contrast to the high demand caused by the increased incidence and mortality of OHCA during the pandemic. Given the important role FR play in the chain of survival, a balanced approach upholding the safety of patients and responders should be sought to keep FR schemes operational.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationCOVID-19Emergency RespondersOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCardiac arrestCitizen first responderCommunity first responderCovid-19First responderOHCAPandemicPersonal protective equipmentResuscitationSurvey

Identifiers

PMID35183230
PMCPMC8857892
OpenAlexW4212887951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.