Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35183205›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2022

Guidelines for short-term medical missions: perspectives from host countries.

Patti Tracey, Ethan Rajaratnam, Julie Varughese, David Venegas, Belinda Gombachika, Mercy Pindani, Elizabeth Ashbourne, Alexandra Martiniuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patti TraceyTrent Fleming School of Nursing, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Dr, Peterborough, ON, K9L 0G2, Canada. pltracey@trentu.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9144-3402
Ethan RajaratnamDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Julie VarugheseAmericares, 88 Hamilton Ave, Stamford, CT, USA.
David VenegasTrent Fleming School of Nursing, Trent University, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Belinda GombachikaKamuzu College of Nursing, University of Malawi, P.O. Box 415, Blantyre, Malawi.
Mercy PindaniKamuzu College of Nursing, University of Malawi, Private Bag 1, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Elizabeth AshbournePartnership for Quality Medical Donations, 326 First Street, Ste 32, Annapolis, MD, 21403, USA.
Alexandra MartiniukFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney School of Public Health, Edward Ford Building A27, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the past decade, there has been increasing guideline development for short-term medical missions (STMMs) traveling from high-income to low- and middle-income countries for the purpose of supporting health care services. The ethics of STMMs is criticized in the literature and there is frequently a lack of host country collaboration. This typically results in guidelines which are developed through the lens of the sending (high-income) countries' staff and organizations. The aim of this paper is to evaluate an existing best practice guideline document from the perspective of host country participants with knowledge of STMMs from Honduras, Malawi, and the Philippines.

methodsThe guideline used for the evaluation consisted of nine best practice elements that were discerned based on literature and the experience of those working within the field. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a cross-sectional study with participants (n = 118) from the host countries. Thematic analysis was conducted by two researchers and the results were assessed by working group members to confirm interpretations of the data.

resultsOverall, participants expressed a strong interest in having more structured guidance surrounding STMM practices. There was a positive response to and general acceptance of the proposed STMM guidelines, although participants found the 24-page document onerous to use; a companion checklist was developed. The key themes that emerged from the interviews included collaboration and coordination, care for hard-to-reach communities, capacity building, critical products and essential medical supplies, and opportunity and feasibility.

conclusionsHost input suggests that the guidelines provide structured regulation and coordination of the medical mission process and have the potential to improve the way STMMs are carried out. The guidelines have also proven to be a useful tool for the actual implementation of STMMs and can be a tool to strengthen links and trust between mission teams and local health staff. However, local contexts vary considerably, and guidelines must be adapted for local use. It is recommended that STMM teams work in conjunction with host partners to ensure they meet local needs, increase capacity development of local health workers, and provide continuity of care for patients into the local system.

Indexed as

Medical MissionsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalawiOrganizationsPhilippinesBest practicesDecolonize Global HealthGuidelinesLow-and middle-income countriesQuality improvementShort-term medical missions

Identifiers

PMID35183205
PMCPMC8857875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.