Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35183134›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2022

The conceptual framework for a combined food literacy and physical activity intervention to optimize metabolic health among women of reproductive age in urban Uganda.

Peter Yiga, Wendy Van Lippevelde, Jan Seghers, Patrick Ogwok, Henry Tafiire, Susan Nakaayi Muluuta, Christophe Matthys

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04635332 (Effectiveness of a Combined Food Literacy and Physical Activity Intervention to Optimize Metabolic Health Among Women of Reproductive Age in Urban Uganda), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04635332 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of a Combined Food Literacy and Physical Activity Intervention to Optimize Metabolic Health Among Women of Reproductive Age in Urban Uganda

TypeinterventionalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2020 to 2021Enrolled132ConditionsAbdominal ObesityArmsFood literacy and physical activity promotion interactive group sessions + Developed health promotion intervention materials (booklet), Developed health promotion intervention materials (booklet).
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter YigaDepartment of Food Technology, Kyambogo University, Kampala, Uganda. pyiga43@gmail.com.
Wendy Van LippeveldeDepartment of Marketing, Innovation and Organization, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Jan SeghersDepartment of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Patrick OgwokDepartment of Food Technology, Kyambogo University, Kampala, Uganda.
Henry TafiireDepartment of Food Technology, Kyambogo University, Kampala, Uganda.
Susan Nakaayi MuluutaDepartment of Food Technology, Kyambogo University, Kampala, Uganda.
Christophe MatthysClinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetabolic health of urban Ugandans, mostly women, has increasingly become sub-optimal. As women are strategic for family behavioral change and do not meet WHO recommendations regarding dietary and physical activity (PA), there is an urgent need for science-based interventions to tackle unhealthy dietary and PA behaviors.

objectiveTo develop a food literacy and PA promotion intervention to optimise metabolic health among women of reproductive age in urban Uganda. METHODOLOGY: Steps 1- 6 of the Intervention Mapping protocol were used to design the intervention.

resultsNotable determinants from Step 1 were health/beauty paradox, nonfactual nutrition information, socio-cultural misconceptions around moderate PA, fruits, and vegetables. Others included gaps in food/PA knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy. We hypothesised that changing the overall existing behaviours in one intervention may meet strong resistance. Thus, we decided to go for gradual stepwise changes. Hence in step 2, three behavioural intervention objectives were formulated; (1) women evaluate the accuracy of nutrition and PA information., (2) engage in moderate intensity PA for at least 150 min a week, and (3) consume at least one portion of vegetables and one portion of fruit every day. Based on the food literacy model, intervention objectives were formulated into performance objectives and matrices of change objectives. In step 3 a combination of eleven behavioural change techniques were selected and translated into practical strategies to effect changes in determinants. In step 4, intervention components and materials were developed. The intervention consists of five interactive group sessions, 150 min each. Infographics on benefits/recommendations, vegetable recipes, and practical tips to eat more fruits, vegetables, and to engage more in PA are included. Personalised goals and action plans tailored to personal metabolic health and lifestyle needs, and environmental opportunities form the basis of the intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted to evaluate the intervention ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04635332 ).

conclusionsThe intervention is novel, based on a holistic food literacy model. The intervention is built on determinants specific to urban Uganda, evidence based behavioural change theoretical models and techniques, detailing the hypothesised behavioural change mechanism. If effective, an evidence-based intervention will become available for reference in urban Uganda.

Indexed as

ExerciseLiteracyDietFemaleHumansUgandaVegetablesFood literacyIntervention mapping protocolMetabolic healthPhysical activityWomen of reproductive age

Identifiers

PMID35183134
PMCPMC8856934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.