Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35183113›Full record

SynthesisGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2022

GWAS and genomic prediction of milk urea nitrogen in Australian and New Zealand dairy cattle.

Irene van den Berg, Phuong N Ho, Tuan V Nguyen, Mekonnen Haile-Mariam, Iona M MacLeod, Phil R Beatson, Erin O'Connor, Jennie E Pryce

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene van den BergCentre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, AgriBioVIC, 3083, Australia. irene.vandenberg@agriculture.vic.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-8636
Phuong N HoCentre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, AgriBioVIC, 3083, Australia.
Tuan V NguyenCentre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, AgriBioVIC, 3083, Australia.
Mekonnen Haile-MariamCentre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, AgriBioVIC, 3083, Australia.
Iona M MacLeodCentre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, AgriBioVIC, 3083, Australia.
Phil R BeatsonCRV Ambreed, PO Box 176, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Erin O'ConnorCRV Ambreed, PO Box 176, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Jennie E PryceCentre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, AgriBioVIC, 3083, Australia.
Agriculture Victoria · AULa Trobe University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary nitrogen leakage is an environmental concern in dairy cattle. Selection for reduced urinary nitrogen leakage may be done using indicator traits such as milk urea nitrogen (MUN). The result of a previous study indicated that the genetic correlation between MUN in Australia (AUS) and MUN in New Zealand (NZL) was only low to moderate (between 0.14 and 0.58). In this context, an alternative is to select sequence variants based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with a view to improve genomic prediction accuracies. A GWAS can also be used to detect quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with MUN. Therefore, our objectives were to perform within-country GWAS and a meta-GWAS for MUN using records from up to 33,873 dairy cows and imputed whole-genome sequence data, to compare QTL detected in the GWAS for MUN in AUS and NZL, and to use sequence variants selected from the meta-GWAS to improve the prediction accuracy for MUN based on a joint AUS-NZL reference set.

resultsUsing the meta-GWAS, we detected 14 QTL for MUN, located on chromosomes 1, 6, 11, 14, 19, 22, 26 and the X chromosome. The three most significant QTL encompassed the casein genes on chromosome 6, PAEP on chromosome 11 and DGAT1 on chromosome 14. We selected 50,000 sequence variants that had the same direction of effect for MUN in AUS and MUN in NZL and that were most significant in the meta-analysis for the GWAS. The selected sequence variants yielded a genetic correlation between MUN in AUS and MUN in NZL of 0.95 and substantially increased prediction accuracy in both countries.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate how the sharing of data between two countries can increase the power of a GWAS and increase the accuracy of genomic prediction using a multi-country reference population and sequence variants selected based on a meta-GWAS.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyMilkAnimalsAustraliaCattleFemaleGenomicsLactationNew ZealandNitrogenUreaNitrogenUrea

Identifiers

PMID35183113
PMCPMC8858489
OpenAlexW4213380756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.