Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35183108›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2022

Objective disease activity assessment and therapeutic drug monitoring prior to biologic therapy changes in routine inflammatory bowel disease clinical practice: TARGET-IBD.

Benjamin Click, Edward L Barnes, Benjamin L Cohen, Bruce E Sands, John S Hanson, David T Rubin, Marla C Dubinsky, Miguel Regueiro, Derek Gazis, Julie M Crawford and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin ClickDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.
Edward L BarnesUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Benjamin L CohenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.
Bruce E SandsMount Sinai, New York, USA.
John S HansonAtrium Health, Charlotte, USA.
David T RubinUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Marla C DubinskyMount Sinai, New York, USA.
Miguel RegueiroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.
Derek GazisTarget RWE Health Evidence Solutions, 2520 Meridian Pkwy, Suite 105, Durham, NC, 27713, USA.
Julie M CrawfordTarget RWE Health Evidence Solutions, 2520 Meridian Pkwy, Suite 105, Durham, NC, 27713, USA. jcrawford@targetrwe.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8976-8558
Millie D LongUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USMount Sinai Medical Center · USTarget (United States) · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USAtrium Medical Cente · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment paradigms recommend objective disease activity assessment and reactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) prior to changes in biologic therapy. We aimed to describe objective marker and TDM assessment in routine clinical practice prior to biologic therapeutic changes in adult IBD patients.

methodsTARGET-IBD is a prospective longitudinal cohort of over 2100 IBD patients receiving usual care at 34 US academic or community centers enrolled between June 2017 and October 2019 who received biologic therapy and had a dose change or biologic discontinuation for lack of efficacy. Objective markers of disease activity within 12 weeks prior included fecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). TDM data for infliximab or adalimumab was obtained.

results525 patients (71.4% Crohn's disease [CD], 28.6% ulcerative colitis [UC]) receiving biologic therapy underwent dose change (55.6%) or discontinuation (44.4%) for lack of efficacy. The majority were Caucasian (85.7%), 18-39 years old (52.2%), privately insured (81.5%), and at academic centers (73.7%). For dose changes, 67.5% had at least one objective disease activity assessment or TDM in the 12 weeks prior (CD 67.9%, UC 66.2%; P = 0.79). The most common objective marker was CRP in both CD (39.1%) and UC (54.5%). CRP and calprotectin were used significantly more in UC (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03). TDM was obtained in 30.7% (28.8% UC, 31.4% CD; P = 0.72) prior to dose change. For biologic discontinuation, 79.4% patients underwent objective assessment or TDM prior. In CD, CRP (46.3%) was most common, and CT (P = 0.03) and MRI (P < 0.001) were significantly more frequent than in UC. TDM was performed in 40.1% of patients (43.5% UC, 38.0% CD, P = 0.49) prior to discontinuation. Among all participants with dose change or discontinuation, endoscopy was performed in 29.3% with CD and 31.3% with UC. Academic care setting was associated with objective assessment before therapy change (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01-2.50).

conclusionNearly one-third of patients undergoing a biologic dose change or discontinuation do not undergo objective disease activity assessment or TDM. Assessment choice differs by disease. Future studies assessing the impact of such practices on long-term outcomes are needed.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeInflammatory Bowel DiseasesAdolescentAdultBiological TherapyDrug MonitoringHumansProspective StudiesYoung AdultDisease monitoringDrug levelsPractice patternsReal-worldRegistry

Identifiers

PMID35183108
PMCPMC8858477
OpenAlexW4213089059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.