Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35183102›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Psychometric properties and modification of the 15-item geriatric depression scale among Chinese oldest-old and centenarians: a mixed-methods study.

Chi Zhang, Hao Zhang, Minghao Zhao, Chen Chen, Zhongquan Li, Deping Liu, Yali Zhao, Yao Yao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Cross-cultural differences in social and self-referential memory are magnified with age.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Chi ZhangDepartment of Education, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hao ZhangDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Minghao ZhaoSchool of Basic Medicine, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Chen ChenDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhongquan LiSchool of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Deping LiuDepartment of Education, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yali ZhaoCentral Laboratory, Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Sanya, Hainan, China. zhaoyl301@163.com.
Yao YaoChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Haidian District, Beijing, China. yao.yao@bjmu.edu.cn.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNCornell University · USNanjing University · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) shows good performance in detecting depression among older persons, but its applicability has not been well studied in non-Western oldest-old adults and centenarians. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric property of the GDS-15 and a simplified version among a large representative longevous population in China.

methodsA total of 1624 individuals (786 oldest-old persons aged from 80 to 99 years; 838 centenarians aged 100+ years) participated in this study. Home interviews with structured questionnaires were conducted to collect sociodemographic data. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Chinese GDS-15 version. We implemented mixed methods for the psychometric evaluation of the GDS-15. Cronbach's α coefficient and item-total correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the internal consistency. A standard expert consultation was conducted to test the content validity of each item. Multiple factor analyses were used to explore the optimal factor structure and measurement invariance.

resultsThe α coefficient of the GDS-15 was 0.745, while two items impaired the overall consistency reliability. Nineteen experts rated the applicability for each item and provided removal suggestion. Five items with less validity were removed, and a simplified 10-item GDS model with three-factor structure was proposed as an optimal solution. The GDS-10 model showed factorial equivalence across age, sex, residence, and education in multi-group confirmatory factor analyses.

conclusionsThe original GDS-15 has acceptable internal reliability, known-group validity, and concurrent validity among Chinese community-dwelling oldest-old and centenarians; however we provided preliminary evidence indicating that individual items related to somatic function or social activities may not be applicable for this population. The modified GDS-10 can be proposed as a potentially more practical and comprehensible instrument for depression screening.

Indexed as

CentenariansDepressionAgedAged, 80 and overFactor Analysis, StatisticalGeriatric AssessmentHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires15-item Geriatric Depression ScaleCentenariansOldest-oldValidity

Identifiers

PMID35183102
PMCPMC8858470
OpenAlexW4212966692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.