ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2022
Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometry Enables Robust Quantitation of Plasma Proteins Regardless of Whole Blood Processing Delays That May Occur in the Clinic.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spleen-derived circulating intercellular adhesion molecule 2 promotes osteosclerosis in chronic myelofibrosis.Bone research · 2026Article
- Targeted proteomic approach for quantification of collagen type I and type III in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Proteomics evaluation of five economical commercial abundant protein depletion kits for enrichment of diseases-specific biomarkers from blood serum.Proteomics · 2023Article
- Targeted Blood Plasma Proteomics and Hemostasis Assessment of Post COVID-19 Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Early Prediction of COVID-19 Patient Survival by Targeted Plasma Multi-Omics and Machine Learning.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plasma is an important biofluid for clinical research and diagnostics. In the clinic, unpredictable delays-from minutes to hours-between blood collection and plasma generation are often unavoidable. These delays can potentially lead to protein degradation and modification and might considerably affect intact protein measurement methods such as sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays that bind proteins on two epitopes to increase specificity, thus requiring largely intact protein structures. Here, we investigated, using multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS), how delays in plasma processing affect peptide-centric "bottom-up" proteomics. We used validated assays for proteotypic peptide surrogates of 270 human proteins to analyze plasma generated after whole blood had been kept at room temperature from 0 to 40 h to mimic delays that occur in the clinic. Moreover, we evaluated the impact of different plasma-thawing conditions on MRM-based plasma protein quantitation. We demonstrate that >90% of protein concentration measurements were unaffected by the thawing procedure and by up to 40-h delayed plasma generation, reflected by relative standard deviations (RSDs) of <30%. Of the 159 MRM assays that yielded quantitative results in 60% of the measured time points, 139 enabled a stable protein quantitation (RSD <20%), 14 showed a slight variation (RSD 20-30%), and 6 appeared unstable/irreproducible (RSD > 30%). These results demonstrate the high robustness and thus the potential for MRM-based plasma-protein quantitation to be used in a clinical setting. In contrast to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, peptide-based MRM assays do not require intact three-dimensional protein structures for an accurate and precise quantitation of protein concentrations in the original sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.