Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35182749›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2022

Penguin: A tool for predicting pseudouridine sites in direct RNA nanopore sequencing data.

Doaa Hassan, Daniel Acevedo, Swapna Vidhur Daulatabad, Quoseena Mir, Sarath Chandra Janga

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Compendium of RNA modifications for bacterial stress adaptation.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2026
    Review
  2. Ψ-Atlas: An Integrated Atlas for Pseudouridine Epitranscriptome.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Small nucleolar RNAs: the hidden precursors of cancer ribosomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Simultaneous nanopore profiling of mRNA mNature biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Doaa HassanDepartment of BioHealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Purdue University, 535 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States; Computers and Systems Department, National Telecommunication Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Daniel AcevedoDepartment of BioHealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Purdue University, 535 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States; Computer Science Department, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, United States.
Swapna Vidhur DaulatabadDepartment of BioHealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Purdue University, 535 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Quoseena MirDepartment of BioHealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Purdue University, 535 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Sarath Chandra JangaDepartment of BioHealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Purdue University, 535 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States; Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Medical Research and Library Building, 975 West Walnut Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States; Centre for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 5021 Health Information and Translational Sciences (HITS), 410 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States. Electronic address: scjanga@iupui.edu.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USNational Telecommunications Institute · EG

Funding

Mapping RNA protein interaction networks in the human genomeR01GM123314 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI JANGA, SARATH CHANDRA · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudouridine is one of the most abundant RNA modifications, occurring when uridines are catalyzed by Pseudouridine synthase proteins. It plays an important role in many biological processes and has been reported to have application in drug development. Recently, the single-molecule sequencing techniques such as the direct RNA sequencing platform offered by Oxford Nanopore technologies have enabled direct detection of RNA modifications on the molecule being sequenced. In this study, we introduce a tool called Penguin that integrates several machine learning (ML) models to identify RNA Pseudouridine sites on Nanopore direct RNA sequencing reads. Pseudouridine sites were identified on single molecule sequencing data collected from direct RNA sequencing resulting in 723 K reads in Hek293 and 500 K reads in Hela cell lines. Penguin extracts a set of features from the raw signal measured by the Oxford Nanopore and the corresponding basecalled k-mer. Those features are used to train the predictors included in Penguin, which in turn, can predict whether the signal is modified by the presence of Pseudouridine sites in the testing phase. We have included various predictors in Penguin, including Support vector machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Neural network (NN). The results on the two benchmark data sets for Hek293 and Hela cell lines show outstanding performance of Penguin either in random split testing or in independent validation testing. In random split testing, Penguin has been able to identify Pseudouridine sites with a high accuracy of 93.38% by applying SVM to Hek293 benchmark dataset. In independent validation testing, Penguin achieves an accuracy of 92.61% by training SVM with Hek293 benchmark dataset and testing it for identifying Pseudouridine sites on Hela benchmark dataset. Thus, Penguin outperforms the existing Pseudouridine predictors in the literature by 16 % higher accuracy than those predictors using independent validation testing. Employing penguin to predict Pseudouridine sites revealed a significant enrichment of "regulation of mRNA 3'-end processing" in Hek293 cell line and 'positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter involved in cellular response to chemical stimulus' in Hela cell line. Penguin software and models are available on GitHub at https://github.com/Janga-Lab/Penguin and can be readily employed for predicting Ψ sites from Nanopore direct RNA-sequencing datasets.

Indexed as

NanoporesNanopore SequencingSpheniscidaeAnimalsHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPseudouridineRNASequence Analysis, RNAPseudouridineRNANanoporePseudouridineRNA modifications

Identifiers

PMID35182749
PMCPMC9232934
OpenAlexW4220667806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.