Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35182632›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2022

Exploring the effects of land management change on productivity, carbon and nutrient balance: Application of an Ensemble Modelling Approach to the upper River Taw observatory, UK.

Kirsty L Hassall, Kevin Coleman, Prakash N Dixit, Steve J Granger, Yusheng Zhang, Ryan T Sharp, Lianhai Wu, Andrew P Whitmore, Goetz M Richter, Adrian L Collins and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kirsty L HassallComputational and Analytical Sciences Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK. Electronic address: kirsty.hassall@rothamsted.ac.uk.
Kevin ColemanSustainable Agriculture Sciences Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK. Electronic address: kevin.coleman@rothamsted.ac.uk.
Prakash N DixitSustainable Agriculture Sciences Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK. Electronic address: prakash.dixit@rothamsted.ac.uk.
Steve J GrangerSustainable Agriculture Sciences department, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Oakhampton EX20 2SB, UK. Electronic address: steve.granger@rothamsted.ac.uk.
Yusheng ZhangSustainable Agriculture Sciences department, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Oakhampton EX20 2SB, UK. Electronic address: yusheng.zhang@rothamsted.ac.uk.
Ryan T SharpSustainable Agriculture Sciences Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK. Electronic address: ryan.sharp@rothamsted.ac.uk.
Lianhai WuSustainable Agriculture Sciences department, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Oakhampton EX20 2SB, UK. Electronic address: lianhai.wu@rothamsted.ac.uk.
Andrew P WhitmoreSustainable Agriculture Sciences Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK. Electronic address: andy.whitmore@rothamsted.ac.uk.
Goetz M RichterSustainable Agriculture Sciences Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK. Electronic address: goetz.richter@rothamsted.ac.uk.
Adrian L CollinsSustainable Agriculture Sciences department, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Oakhampton EX20 2SB, UK. Electronic address: adrian.collins@rothamsted.ac.uk.
Alice E MilneSustainable Agriculture Sciences Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK. Electronic address: alice.milne@rothamsted.ac.uk.
Rothamsted Research · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/000I0330Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/000J0100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture is challenged to produce healthy food and to contribute to cleaner energy whilst mitigating climate change and protecting ecosystems. To achieve this, policy-driven scenarios need to be evaluated with available data and models to explore trade-offs with robust accounting for the uncertainty in predictions. We developed a novel model ensemble using four complementary state-of-the-art agroecosystems models to explore the impacts of land management change. The ensemble was used to simulate key agricultural and environmental outputs under various scenarios for the upper River Taw observatory, UK. Scenarios assumed (i) reducing livestock production whilst simultaneously increasing the area of arable where it is feasible to cultivate (PG2A), (ii) reducing livestock production whilst simultaneously increasing bioenergy production in areas of the catchment that are amenable to growing bioenergy crops (PG2BE) and (iii) increasing both arable and bioenergy production (PG2A + BE). Our ensemble approach combined model uncertainty using the tower property of expectation and the law of total variance. Results show considerable uncertainty for predicted nutrient losses with different models partitioning the uncertainty into different pathways. Bioenergy crops were predicted to produce greatest yields from Miscanthus in lowland and from SRC-willow (cv. Endurance) in uplands. Each choice of management is associated with trade-offs; e.g. PG2A results in a significant increase of edible calories (6736 Mcal ha

Indexed as

EcosystemRiversAgricultureCarbonConservation of Natural ResourcesCrops, AgriculturalNutrientsUnited KingdomCarbonNutrientsAgroecosystems modellingArable and livestock systemsEnsemble modellingNutrients flowsTrade-offs

Identifiers

PMID35182632
PMCPMC9022088
OpenAlexW4213379500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.