Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35182604›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2022

Independent evaluation of the harvard automated processing pipeline for Electroencephalography 1.0 using multi-site EEG data from children with Fragile X Syndrome.

Emma Auger, Elizabeth M Berry-Kravis, Lauren E Ethridge

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma AugerDepartment of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019-2007, USA.
Elizabeth M Berry-KravisDepartment of Pediatrics, Neurological Sciences, and Biochemistry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Lauren E EthridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019-2007, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA. Electronic address: ethri@ou.edu.
Rush University Medical Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

Clinical Coordinating Center Network of Excellence in Neuroscience Clinical TrialU01NS077179 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Merit E CUDKOWICZ, Aleksandar Videnovic · 2011 to 2026
$43.4M
Network of Excellence in Neuroscience Clinical Trials (NEXT)-DCCU01NS077352 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CHRISTOPHER S. COFFEY · 2011 to 2026
$28.1M
Effects of AFQ056 on Language Learning in Young Children with Fragile X Syndrome (FXS)U01NS096767 · NINDS · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ABBEDUTO, LEONARD J., BERRY-KRAVIS, ELIZABETH MARA · 2016 to 2019
$11.5M
Research Project: Pathologic Significance of Maternal AutoantibodiesP50HD103526 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEONARD J. ABBEDUTO, Melissa Dawn Bauman · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103526NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS077179NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS077352NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS096767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Harvard Automatic Processing Pipeline for Electroencephalography (HAPPE) is a computerized EEG data processing pipeline designed for multiple site analysis of populations with neurodevelopmental disorders. This pipeline has been validated in-house by the developers but external testing using real-world datasets remains to be done. NEW

methodResting and auditory event-related EEG data from 29 children ages 3-6 years with Fragile X Syndrome as well as simulated EEG data was used to evaluate HAPPE's noise reduction techniques, data standardization features, and data integration compared to traditional manualized processing.

resultsFor the real EEG data, HAPPE pipeline showed greater trials retained, greater variance retained through independent component analysis (ICA) component removal, and smaller kurtosis than the manual pipeline; the manual pipeline had a significantly larger signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). For simulated EEG data, correlation between the pure signal and processed data was significantly higher for manually-processed data compared to HAPPE-processed data. Hierarchical linear modeling showed greater signal recovery in the manual pipeline with the exception of the gamma band signal which showed mixed results. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsSNR and simulated signal retention was significantly greater in the manually-processed data than the HAPPE-processed data. Signal reduction may negatively affect outcome measures.

conclusionsThe HAPPE pipeline benefits from less active processing time and artifact reduction without removing segments. However, HAPPE may bias toward elimination of noise at the cost of signal. Recommended implementation of the HAPPE pipeline for neurodevelopmental populations depends on the goals and priorities of the research.

Indexed as

Fragile X SyndromeAlgorithmsArtifactsChildChild, PreschoolElectroencephalographyHumansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise RatioArtifact removalAutomated processingEEGEEG ArtifactsElectroencephalographyFragile X syndromeFXSHAPPEHLMNeurodevelopmental disordersSignal-to-noise ratioSimulated dataSNR

Identifiers

PMID35182604
PMCPMC8962770
OpenAlexW3122244514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.