Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35182509›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Neurology2022

Whole genome sequencing for the diagnosis of neurological repeat expansion disorders in the UK: a retrospective diagnostic accuracy and prospective clinical validation study.

Kristina Ibañez, James Polke, R Tanner Hagelstrom, Egor Dolzhenko, Dorota Pasko, Ellen Rachel Amy Thomas, Louise C Daugherty, Dalia Kasperaviciute, Katherine R Smith, WGS for Neurological Diseases Group and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
31.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genetic analysis of neurodegenerative diseases.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  20. Another common genetic ataxia in South Korea: Spinocerebellar ataxia 36.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristina IbañezGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
James PolkeNeurogenetics Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
R Tanner HagelstromIllumina, San Diego, CA, USA.
Egor DolzhenkoIllumina, San Diego, CA, USA.
Dorota PaskoGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ellen Rachel Amy ThomasGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Louise C DaughertyGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Healx, Cambridge, UK.
Dalia KasperaviciuteGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Katherine R SmithGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
WGS for Neurological Diseases Group
Zandra C DeansGenomics Quality Assessment, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; NHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK.
Sue HillNHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK.
Tom FowlerGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Richard H ScottGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Department of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
John HardyDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Patrick F ChinneryMRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit and Department of ClinicalNeurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Henry HouldenNeurogenetics Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK; Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Augusto RendonGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Mark J CaulfieldGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Michael A EberleIllumina, San Diego, CA, USA.
Ryan J TaftIllumina, San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: rtaft@illumina.com.
Arianna TucciGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. Electronic address: a.tucci@qmul.ac.uk.
Genomics England Research Consortium
Illumina (United States) · USGenomics England · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBNHS England

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0701075Medical Research Council G0901254Medical Research Council G1001253Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/M009203/1Medical Research Council MC_PC_14089Medical Research Council MC_UU_00015/9Medical Research Council MR/J004758/1Medical Research Council MR/K000608/1Medical Research Council MR/K01417X/1Medical Research Council MR/L501542/1Medical Research Council MR/M009203/1Medical Research Council MR/S006753/1Medical Research Council MR/S01165X/1Medical Research Council MR/S035699/1Parkinson's UK G-0907Parkinson's UK G-1307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRepeat expansion disorders affect about 1 in 3000 individuals and are clinically heterogeneous diseases caused by expansions of short tandem DNA repeats. Genetic testing is often locus-specific, resulting in underdiagnosis of people who have atypical clinical presentations, especially in paediatric patients without a previous positive family history. Whole genome sequencing is increasingly used as a first-line test for other rare genetic disorders, and we aimed to assess its performance in the diagnosis of patients with neurological repeat expansion disorders.

methodsWe retrospectively assessed the diagnostic accuracy of whole genome sequencing to detect the most common repeat expansion loci associated with neurological outcomes (AR, ATN1, ATXN1, ATXN2, ATXN3, ATXN7, C9orf72, CACNA1A, DMPK, FMR1, FXN, HTT, and TBP) using samples obtained within the National Health Service in England from patients who were suspected of having neurological disorders; previous PCR test results were used as the reference standard. The clinical accuracy of whole genome sequencing to detect repeat expansions was prospectively examined in previously genetically tested and undiagnosed patients recruited in 2013-17 to the 100 000 Genomes Project in the UK, who were suspected of having a genetic neurological disorder (familial or early-onset forms of ataxia, neuropathy, spastic paraplegia, dementia, motor neuron disease, parkinsonian movement disorders, intellectual disability, or neuromuscular disorders). If a repeat expansion call was made using whole genome sequencing, PCR was used to confirm the result.

findingsThe diagnostic accuracy of whole genome sequencing to detect repeat expansions was evaluated against 793 PCR tests previously performed within the NHS from 404 patients. Whole genome sequencing correctly classified 215 of 221 expanded alleles and 1316 of 1321 non-expanded alleles, showing 97·3% sensitivity (95% CI 94·2-99·0) and 99·6% specificity (99·1-99·9) across the 13 disease-associated loci when compared with PCR test results. In samples from 11 631 patients in the 100 000 Genomes Project, whole genome sequencing identified 81 repeat expansions, which were also tested by PCR: 68 were confirmed as repeat expansions in the full pathogenic range, 11 were non-pathogenic intermediate expansions or premutations, and two were non-expanded repeats (16% false discovery rate).

interpretationIn our study, whole genome sequencing for the detection of repeat expansions showed high sensitivity and specificity, and it led to identification of neurological repeat expansion disorders in previously undiagnosed patients. These findings support implementation of whole genome sequencing in clinical laboratories for diagnosis of patients who have a neurological presentation consistent with a repeat expansion disorder.

fundingMedical Research Council, Department of Health and Social Care, National Health Service England, National Institute for Health Research, and Illumina.

Indexed as

DNA Repeat ExpansionState MedicineChildFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1HumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomWhole Genome SequencingFMR1 protein, humanFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

Identifiers

PMID35182509
PMCPMC8850201
OpenAlexW4212820494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.