Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35182451›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2022

The spatial pattern of human exposure to Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus is not consistent with red deer-based risk predictions.

Mario Frías, Raúl Cuadrado-Matías, María Del Castillo Jarilla-Fernández, Pedro López-López, Laia Casades-Martí, Elena Madrigal, Antonio Rivero, Antonio Rivero-Juárez, Francisco Ruiz-Fons

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mario FríasInfectious Diseases Unit, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía de Córdoba, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Raúl Cuadrado-MatíasHealth & Biotechnology (SaBio) Group, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
María Del Castillo Jarilla-FernándezBlood Bank, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Pedro López-LópezInfectious Diseases Unit, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía de Córdoba, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Laia Casades-MartíHealth & Biotechnology (SaBio) Group, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Elena MadrigalBlood Bank, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Antonio RiveroInfectious Diseases Unit, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía de Córdoba, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5813-6889
Antonio Rivero-JuárezInfectious Diseases Unit, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía de Córdoba, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Francisco Ruiz-FonsHealth & Biotechnology (SaBio) Group, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0820-5292
Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ESInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos · ESHospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real · ES

Funding

European Social FundJunta de Comunidades de Castilla-La ManchaSpanish Ministry for the Science and Innovation (MCI)Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the spatial risk of exposure to Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) infection of healthy blood donors in an enzootic region with a predicted risk gradient based on a virus-animal interaction risk model. We designed a cross-sectional study to test if the exposure pattern of the human population to CCHFV spatially matches the predicted risk. We randomly selected 1384 donors from different risk gradients and analyzed their sera searching for CCHFV antibodies. None of the selected blood donors showed exposure to CCHFV. This study shows that exposure risk spatial patterns, as predicted from animal-tick-virus models, does not necessarily match the pattern of human-infected tick interactions leading to CCHFV infection and CCHF cases, at least in a region of predicted moderate infection risk. The findings suggest that future studies should bear the potential drivers of tick-human encounter rates into account to more accurately predict risks.

Indexed as

DeerHemorrhagic Fever, CrimeanHemorrhagic Fever Virus, Crimean-CongoTicksAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansblood donorsCCHFVenzootic arearisk gradientsserosurvey

Identifiers

PMID35182451
PMCPMC9790474
OpenAlexW4213001379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.