Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35182389›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2022

Developing a More Tailored Approach to Patient and Public Involvement with Children and Families in Pediatric Clinical Research: Lessons Learned.

J Preston, B Nafria, A Ohmer, S Gaillard, P Dicks, L West, M A Turner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Involvement of children and young people in the conduct of health research: A rapid umbrella review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Neurodevelopmental considerations for transcranial magnetic stimulation trials in youth.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Working with children and young people in research: Supportive practices and pathways to impact.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The League: A person-centred approach to the development of social robotics for paediatric anxiety.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J PrestonFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Women's and Children's Health, Liverpool Health Partners, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. jennifer.preston@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4800-234X
B NafriaInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Spain and Innovation and Research Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Pg, Santa Rosa 39-57, Sant Joan de Déu, 2, Esplugues de Llobregat, 08950, Barcelona, Spain.
A OhmerInternational Children's Advisory Network, Atlanta, GA, USA.
S GaillardHospices Civils de Lyon, EPICIME-CIC 1407 de Lyon, Inserm, CHU-Lyon, 69677, Bron, France.
P DicksNHS-NRS Children, NHS Grampian, Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZG, Scotland, UK.
L WestGeorgia Institute of Technology, and International Children's Advisory Network, Atlanta, GA, USA.
M A TurnerFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Women's and Children's Health, Liverpool Health Partners, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listening to, and acting on, the voices of children and families during clinical research and innovation is fundamental to ensuring enhanced pediatric health care, medicines development, and technological advances. While this is often discussed as an important step in ensuring patient-centered care, involving children and families across the life cycle of clinical research is not currently routine. The pediatric research community needs to address how to meaningfully involve children and families if they are to succeed in designing clinical research that suits the needs of pediatric patients and their families. This paper describes how an international community working under the umbrella International Children's Advisory Network (iCAN) and European Young Person's Advisory Group Network (eYPAGnet) has involved children and families in the design and delivery of pediatric clinical research. It offers practical solutions through various case studies assessed against seven patient engagement quality criteria within the Patient Engagement Quality Guidance (PEQG) tool, highlighting some of the lessons learnt from involving and engaging with children and families across different stages of clinical research, including pediatric trials for drug development programs.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchPatient ParticipationPediatricsAdolescentChildHumansPatient-Centered CareChildrenFamiliesInvolvementPatient-centricityPediatric clinical research

Identifiers

PMID35182389
PMCPMC8857393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.