Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35182316›Full record

SynthesisJournal of ultrasound2023

Sonographic normal values for the cross-sectional area of the ulnar nerve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nadine Boers, Enrico Martin, Marc Mazur, David D Krijgh, Monique H M Vlak, Godard C W de Ruiter, H Stephan Goedee, J Henk Coert

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of ultrasound, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadine BoersDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. n.boers-2@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0873-6405
Enrico MartinDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marc MazurDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
David D KrijghDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Monique H M VlakDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Godard C W de RuiterDepartment of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
H Stephan GoedeeDepartment of Neurology, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Henk CoertDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Medisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNerve size is a commonly used sonographic parameter when assessing suspected entrapment of the ulnar nerve. We aimed to create a robust set of normal values, based on a critical review of published normal values.

methodsWe performed a systematic evaluation of studies on normal ulnar nerve sizes, identified in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Using meta-analyses, we determined pooled mean cross-sectional area (CSA) values for different anatomical locations of the ulnar nerve throughout the arm. Subgroup analyses were performed for gender, probe frequency, in- or exclusion of diabetic patients, position of the elbow and Asian versus other populations.

resultsWe identified 90 studies of which 77 studies were included for further analyses after quality review, resulting in data from 5772 arms of 3472 participants. Subgroup analyses show lower CSA values at at the wrist crease and proximal to the wrist crease when using low frequency probes (< 15 MHz) and at the wrist crease, proximal to the wrist crease, proximal forearm and the distal upper arm in Asians. CSA values were lower when in flexed position compared to extended position for the cubital tunnel inlet only. No difference was found for gender.

conclusionsOur systematic review provides a comprehensive set of normal values at sites along the entire length of the ulnar nerve. This provides a foundation for clinical practise and upon which future studies could be more systematically compared.

Indexed as

ArmUlnar NerveHumansReference ValuesUltrasonographyWristCross-sectional areaNormal valuesReference valuesUlnar nerveUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID35182316
PMCPMC10063700
OpenAlexW4213257397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.