Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35182270›Full record

SynthesisClinical rheumatology2022

Diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review.

Charles A Hay, Jon Packham, Sarah Ryan, Christian D Mallen, Alexandros Chatzixenitidis, James A Prior

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charles A HaySchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3496-7044
Jon PackhamSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5531-1680
Sarah RyanMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-6266
Christian D MallenSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2677-1028
Alexandros ChatzixenitidisSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4533-2474
James A PriorSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK. j.a.prior@keele.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9213-2796
Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBKeele University · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) remains challenging, frequently resulting in a diagnostic delay for patients. Current benchmarks of delay are usually reported as mean data, which are typically skewed and therefore may be overestimating delay. Our aim was to determine the extent of median delay patients' experience in receiving a diagnosis of axSpA and examine whether specific factors are associated with the presence of such delay. We conducted a systematic review across five literature databases (from inception to November 2021), with studies reporting the average time period of diagnostic delay in patients with axSpA being included. Any additional information examining associations between specific factors and delay were also extracted. A narrative synthesis was used to report the median range of diagnostic delay experienced by patients with axSpA and summarise which factors have a role in the delay. From an initial 11,995 articles, 69 reported an average time period of diagnostic delay, with 25 of these providing a median delay from symptom onset to diagnosis. Across these studies, delay ranged from 0.67 to 8 years, with over three-quarters reporting a median of between 2 years and 6 years. A third of all studies reported median delay data ranging from just 2 to 2.3 years. Of seven variables reported with sufficient frequency to evaluate, only 'gender' and 'family history of axSpA' had sufficient concordant data to draw any conclusion on their role, neither influenced the extent of the delay. Despite improvements in recent decades, patients with axSpA frequently experience years of diagnostic delay and this remains an extensive worldwide problem. This is further compounded by a mixed picture of the disease, patient and healthcare-related factors influencing delay. Key points • Despite improvements in recent decades, patients with axSpA frequently experience years of diagnostic delay. • Median diagnostic delay typically ranges from 2 to 6 years globally. • Neither 'gender' nor 'family history of axSpA' influenced the extent of diagnostic delay experienced. • Diagnostic delay based on mean, rather than median, data influences the interpretation of the delay time period and consistently reports a longer delay period.

Indexed as

Axial SpondyloarthritisSpondylarthritisSpondylitis, AnkylosingDatabases, FactualDelayed DiagnosisHumansAnkylosing spondylitisAxial spondyloarthritisDiagnostic delay

Identifiers

PMID35182270
PMCPMC9187558
OpenAlexW4212872563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.