Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35182246›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2022

Accuracy of High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry Metrics for Predicting Aspiration and Residue in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Patients with Poor Pharyngeal Contractility.

Howell Henrian G Bayona, Nicole Pizzorni, Jan Tack, Ann Goeleven, Taher Omari, Nathalie Rommel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Howell Henrian G BayonaDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, Deglutology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, PO box 721, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Nicole PizzorniDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Jan TackTranslational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ann GoelevenDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, Deglutology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, PO box 721, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Taher OmariCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Nathalie RommelDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, Deglutology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, PO box 721, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. nathalie.rommel@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-5675-7334
KU Leuven · BEFlinders University · AUUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of the Philippines Manila · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several physiological metrics can be derived from pharyngeal high-resolution impedance manometry (HRPM), but their clinical relevance has not been well established. We investigated the diagnostic performance of these metrics in relation to videofluoroscopic (VFS) assessment of aspiration and residue in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. We analyzed 263 swallows from 72 adult patients (22-91 years) with diverse medical conditions. Metrics of contractility, upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening and relaxation, flow timing, intrabolus distension pressure, and a global Swallow Risk Index (SRI) were derived from pressure-impedance recordings using pressure-flow analysis. VFS data were independently scored for airway invasion and pharyngeal residue using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale and the Normalized Residue Ratio Scale, respectively. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine the relationship of HRPM metrics with radiological outcomes and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy. We identified aspiration in 25% and pharyngeal residue in 84% of the swallows. Aspiration was independently associated with hypopharyngeal peak pressure < 65 mmHg (HypoPeakP) [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 5.27; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (0.99-28.1); p = 0.051], SRI > 15 [OR 4.37; 95% CI (1.87-10.2); p < 0.001] and proximal esophageal contractile integral (PCI) < 55 mmHg·cm·s [OR 2.30; 95% CI (1.07-4.96); p = 0.034]. Pyriform sinus residue was independently predicted by HypoPeakP < 65 mmHg [OR 7.32; 95% CI (1.93-27.7); p = 0.003], UES integrated relaxation pressure (UES-IRP) > 3 mmHg [OR 2.96; 95% CI (1.49-5.88); p = 0.002], and SRI > 15 [OR 2.17; 95% CI (1.04-4.51); p = 0.039]. Area under ROC curve (AUC) values for individual HRPM metrics ranged from 0.59 to 0.74. Optimal cut-off values were identified. This study demonstrates the diagnostic value of certain proposed and adjunct HRPM metrics for identifying signs of unsafe and inefficient bolus transport in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersAdultDeglutitionEsophageal Sphincter, UpperHumansManometryPharynxPressureAspirationDeglutitionDeglutition disordersDiagnostic accuracyHigh-resolution pharyngeal manometryOropharyngeal dysphagiaVideofluoroscopy

Identifiers

PMID35182246
OpenAlexW4213170865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.