ArticleHuman genetics2022
DVPred: a disease-specific prediction tool for variant pathogenicity classification for hearing loss.
Article in Human genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A CLN8 biallelic missense variant causes epilepsy with severe treatment-resistant psychosis.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Article
- Expanding the utility of variant effect predictions with phenotype-specific models.Nature communications · 2025Article
- PRP: pathogenic risk prediction for rare nonsynonymous single nucleotide variants.Human genetics · 2025Article
- Rare disease genomics and precision medicine.Genomics & informatics · 2024Review
- Novel mutation leading to splice donor loss in a conserved site ofJournal of medical genetics · 2024Article
- PdmIRD: missense variants pathogenicity prediction for inherited retinal diseases in a disease-specific manner.Human genetics · 2024Article
- GenOtoScope: Towards automating ACMG classification of variants associated with congenital hearing loss.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Computational approaches for predicting variant impact: An overview from resources, principles to applications.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Numerous computational prediction tools have been introduced to estimate the functional impact of variants in the human genome based on evolutionary constraints and biochemical metrics. However, their implementation in diagnostic settings to classify variants faced challenges with accuracy and validity. Most existing tools are pan-genome and pan-diseases, which neglected gene- and disease-specific properties and limited the accessibility of curated data. As a proof-of-concept, we developed a disease-specific prediction tool named Deafness Variant deleteriousness Prediction tool (DVPred) that focused on the 157 genes reportedly causing genetic hearing loss (HL). DVPred applied the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) algorithm to the dataset consisting of expert-curated pathogenic and benign variants from a large in-house HL patient cohort and public databases. With the incorporation of variant-level and gene-level features, DVPred outperformed the existing universal tools. It boasts an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98, and showed consistent performance (AUC = 0.985) in an independent assessment dataset. We further demonstrated that multiple gene-level metrics, including low complexity genomic regions and substitution intolerance scores, were the top features of the model. A comprehensive analysis of missense variants showed a gene-specific ratio of predicted deleterious and neutral variants, implying varied tolerance or intolerance to variation in different genes. DVPred explored the utility of disease-specific strategy in improving the deafness variant prediction tool. It can improve the prioritization of pathogenic variants among massive variants identified by high-throughput sequencing on HL genes. It also shed light on the development of variant prediction tools for other genetic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.