Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35182206›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

Natural history of lower urinary tract symptoms among men undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer with and without a Rectal Hydrogel Spacer.

Mark N Alshak, Andrew Eidelberg, Susana Martinez Diaz, Michelina D Stoddard, Silvia Formenti, Himanshu Nagar, Josephine Kang, Bilal Chughtai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark N AlshakWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Andrew EidelbergWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Susana Martinez DiazDepartment of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.
Michelina D StoddardDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Silvia FormentiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Himanshu NagarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Josephine Kang *Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Bilal Chughtai *Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA. bic9008@med.cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0515-2578
Cornell University · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for prostate cancer, but has morbidity as both the bladder and rectum are radiated during treatment. Our goal was to document and compare lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) among men who underwent SBRT with and without SpaceOAR hydrogel (Augmenix, Inc., Bedford, MA).

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 87 men (50 SpaceOAR and 37 non-SpaceOAR) who underwent SBRT. Primary outcomes were patient reported symptoms during radiation therapy, pharmacotherapy usage, and urologic and bowel survey scores up to 6-months post-SBRT.

results78% of men were on α-inhibitors at the end of SBRT, an increase from 27.6% baseline usage (p < 0.001). Post-SBRT urinary frequency was more common in the non-SpaceOAR group versus the SpaceOAR group (68% versus 38%, p = 0.006), as was nocturia (35% vs. 8%, p = 0.002). Acute gastrointestinal symptoms did not differ. 58.8% of men were on α-inhibitors at 6-months of follow-up post-SBRT, an increase from 27.6% baseline usage (p < 0.001). Importantly, there was a difference of α-inhibitor use between non-SpaceOAR and SpaceOAR groups at the end of SBRT and at 1.5-, 3-, and 6-months follow up (86% vs. 53% [p = 0.002], 83% vs. 53% [p = 0.005], 72% vs. 49% [p = 0.038], respectively).

conclusionLUTS after SBRT remains a significant problem for men undergoing treatment for prostate cancer. LUTS affects men during and up to 6-months following SBRT. Owing to these increased LUTS, preemptive minimally invasive solutions and their mechanisms of protection, including the SpaceOAR, should be further investigated.

Indexed as

Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsProstatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryHumansHydrogelsMaleRadiotherapy DosageRectumRetrospective StudiesHydrogelsLower urinary tract symptomsProstate cancerRectal Hydrogel SpacerStereotactic body radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID35182206
OpenAlexW4213049866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.