Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35182154›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2022

The Impact of COVID-19 Among Black Girls: A Social-Ecological Perspective.

Natasha Crooks, Wuraola Sosina, Alyssa Debra, Geri Donenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risk, Adultification, Messaging, and Protection Scale (RAMPS): The development of a measure for Black girls.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Community Teens' COVID-19 Experience: Implications for Engagement Moving Forward.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natasha CrooksDepartment of Human Development Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0178-2844
Wuraola SosinaClinical Psychology Department, Adler University, USA.
Alyssa DebraCollege of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, USA.
Geri DonenbergDepartment of Medicine, Center for Dissemination and Implementation Science, University of Illinois Chicago, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Black adolescent girls' physical, psychological, and sexual development.

methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with 25 girls (9-18 years old) primarily across the Midwestern United States. Interviews were conducted until theoretical saturation was reached. We conducted a conventional content analysis by reviewing transcripts, coding data, and developing themes.

resultsUtilizing the social-ecological model findings revealed themes related to the individual-, interpersonal-, institutional-, and community-level changes that Black girls experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

conclusionsBlack adolescent girls need opportunities to discuss the changes, receive relevant resources, and have spaces to support their physical, psychological, and sexual development. Systems such as families, schools, and clinics should implement programming to facilitate discussions around the impact of COVID-19 on Black girls.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentChildFemaleHumansMidwestern United StatesPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19health disparities and inequitieshealth promotion and preventionpsychosocial functioningsexual or reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID35182154
PMCPMC8903447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.