ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2022
Effects of Immediate Coating on Unset Composite with Different Bonding Agents to Surface Hardness.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Full analysis of the effects of modeler liquids on the properties of direct resin-based composites: a meta-analysis review of in vitro studies.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of Wetting Agents on Microhardness, Color, and Gloss of a Nanohybrid Composite after Aging.Brazilian dental journal · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Microbial Adhesion and Surface Morphology of Bonded and Non-Bonded Resin-Based Composite Materials: A SEM and Microbiological Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Shear Bond Strength of Composite Diluted with Composite-Handling Agents on Dentin and Enamel.Polymers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluated the surface microhardness of composite, affected by surface coating with different dental adhesive systems. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 100 composite discs were divided into five groups. Group 1 was uncoated (control group C), and groups 2 to 5 were coated with different adhesive systems (OptiBond FL: FL, OptiBond SOLO Plus: SOLO, OptiBond XTR: XTR, and OptiBond All in one: AIO, respectively). The Vickers microhardness (VHN) was measured without and with 500 thermocycles. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's posthoc test at the 95% confidence level.
resultsAt 24 hours, the VHN of C (59.96 ± 3.68) and FL (59.83 ± 4.54) were significantly higher than SOLO (51.73 ± 4.63) and AIO (51.45 ± 4.11). The VHN of XTR (54.96 ± 3.68) was not significant compared with that of C and all other groups. After thermocycling, VHN were significantly decreased in all groups. However, there were no significant differences among all groups.
conclusionsAt 24 hours, composite coated with different adhesive systems have different effects to VHN. Thermocycling all adhesive resin systems coated on composite surface significantly decreased the VHN.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.