Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35181709›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Two new Russula species (fungi) from dry dipterocarp forest in Thailand suggest niche specialization to this habitat type.

Komsit Wisitrassameewong, Cathrin Manz, Felix Hampe, Brian P Looney, Thitiya Boonpratuang, Annemieke Verbeken, Tuksaporn Thummarukcharoen, Tanakorn Apichitnaranon, Maneerat Pobkwamsuk, Miroslav Caboň and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unveiling the Bioactive Compounds and Therapeutic Potential ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Notes on four species ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Komsit WisitrassameewongNational Biobank of Thailand, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand Science Park, Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Cathrin ManzMycology Research Group, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue Straße 13, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Felix Hampe, Butzbach, Germany.
Brian P LooneyDepartment of Biology, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA.
Thitiya BoonpratuangNational Biobank of Thailand, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand Science Park, Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Annemieke VerbekenResearch Group Mycology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Tuksaporn ThummarukcharoenNational Biobank of Thailand, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand Science Park, Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Tanakorn ApichitnaranonNational Biobank of Thailand, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand Science Park, Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Maneerat PobkwamsukNational Biobank of Thailand, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand Science Park, Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Miroslav CaboňPlant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 23, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Slavomír AdamčíkPlant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 23, Bratislava, Slovakia. slavomir.adamcik@savba.sk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry dipterocarp forests are among the most common habitat types in Thailand. Russulaceae are known as common ectomycorrhizal symbionts of Dipterocarpaceae trees in this type of habitat. The present study aims to identify collections of Russula subsection Amoeninae Buyck from dry dipterocarp forests in Thailand. A multi-locus phylogenetic analysis placed Thai Amoeninae collections in two novel lineages, and they are described here as R. bellissima sp. nov. and R. luteonana sp. nov. The closest identified relatives of both species were sequestrate species suggesting that they may belong to drought-adapted lineages. An analysis of publicly available ITS sequences in R. subsect. Amoeninae did not confirm evidence of any of the new species occurring in other Asian regions, indicating that dry dipterocarp forests might harbor a novel community of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Macromorphological characters are variable and are not totally reliable for distinguishing the new species from other previously described Asian Amoeninae species. Both new species are defined by a combination of differentiated micromorphological characteristics in spore ornamentation, hymenial cystidia and hyphal terminations in the pileipellis. The new Amoeninae species may correspond to some Russula species collected for consumption in Thailand, and the detailed description of the new species can be used for better identification of edible species and food safety in the region.

Indexed as

PhylogenyBasidiomycotaDipterocarpaceaeDNA, FungalEcosystemForestsMycorrhizaeThailandTropical ClimateDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID35181709
PMCPMC8857229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.