ArticleScientific reports2022
Investigation of discordant SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results using minimally processed saliva.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coupling Exponential Rolling Circle Amplification to Lateral Flow Devices for Point-of-Care Detection of Viral RNA.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Transforming RNA Degradation into Accurate RNA Detection: RNase I-Assisted Rolling Circle Amplification for Clinical Samples.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Accuracy of saliva tests for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis during the pandemic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing Clinical Detection Accuracy of Large Structured Viral RNA via DNAzyme Cleavage and Antisense-Assisted Rolling Circle Amplification.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- SARS-CoV-2 Infection in School Settings, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan, 2021-2022.Emerging infectious diseases · 2024Article
- SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP in saliva: enhancing the results via a combination of cooling and specimen dilution procedure.Virusdisease · 2024Article
- Saliva-based detection of SARS-CoV-2: a bibliometric analysis of global research.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2024Article
- Critical evaluation of strategies to achieve direct real-time PCR detection of swine pathogens in oral fluids.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2023Article
- Recent advances in RNA sample preparation techniques for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva and gargle.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2023Review
- A multiplexed, paired-pooled droplet digital PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Saliva is an attractive sample for coronavirus disease 2019 testing due its ease of collection and amenability to detect viral RNA with minimal processing. Using a direct-to-RT-PCR method with saliva self-collected from confirmed COVID-19 positive volunteers, we observed 32% false negative results. Confirmed negative and healthy volunteer samples spiked with 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.