ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2022
Clinical pharmacogenetic analysis in 5,001 individuals with diagnostic Exome Sequencing data.
Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformative Applications and Innovations in Next-Generation Sequencing Data Analysis.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- Prevalence of actionable pharmacogenomic variants in Brazilian patients with cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Multigene Panel for Pharmacogenomics Testing Using Next-Generation Sequencing for Routine Clinical Practice.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenomic Calling From Whole-Exome Sequencing in the Taiwanese Population-A Real-World Experience.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2026Article
- The history and future of pharmacogenetics in Aotearoa/New Zealand.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Review
- Clinical impact of pharmacogenomics in pediatric care: insights extracted from clinical exome sequencing.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Polymorphism c.2194G>A Screening Is a Useful Tool for Decreasing Gastrointestinal and Hematological Adverse Drug Reaction Risk in Fluoropyrimidine-Treated Patients.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Development of a coding SNP panel for tracking the origin of whole-exome sequencing samples.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- PharmVar Tutorial on CYP2D6 Structural Variation Testing and Recommendations on Reporting.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2023Review
- Current status of the analytical validation of next generation sequencing applications for pharmacogenetic profiling.Molecular biology reports · 2023Review
- Current status of the analytical validation of next generation sequencing applications for pharmacogenetic profiling.Molecular biology reports · 2023Review
- A Comprehensive Analysis of 21 Actionable Pharmacogenes in the Spanish Population: From Genetic Characterisation to Clinical Impact.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- PAnno: A pharmacogenomics annotation tool for clinical genomic testing.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Pharmacogenomic profile of actionable molecular variants related to drugs commonly used in anesthesia: WES analysis reveals new mutations.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Genotyping ofPharmaceutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exome sequencing is utilized in routine clinical genetic diagnosis. The technical robustness of repurposing large-scale next-generation sequencing data for pharmacogenetics has been demonstrated, supporting the implementation of preemptive pharmacogenetic strategies based on adding clinical pharmacogenetic interpretation to exomes. However, a comprehensive study analyzing all actionable pharmacogenetic alleles contained in international guidelines and applied to diagnostic exome data has not been performed. Here, we carried out a systematic analysis based on 5001 Spanish or Latin American individuals with diagnostic exome data, either Whole Exome Sequencing (80%), or the so-called Clinical Exome Sequencing (20%) (60 Mb and 17 Mb, respectively), to provide with global and gene-specific clinical pharmacogenetic utility data. 788 pharmacogenetic alleles, distributed through 19 genes included in Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines were analyzed. We established that Whole Exome and Clinical Exome Sequencing performed similarly, and 280 alleles in 11 genes (CACNA1S, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP4F2, DPYD, G6PD, NUDT15, RYR1, SLCO1B1, TPMT, and UGT1A1) could be used to inform of pharmacogenetic phenotypes that change drug prescription. Each individual carried in average 2.2 alleles and overall 95% (n = 4646) of the cohort could be informed of at least one actionable pharmacogenetic phenotype. Differences in variant allele frequency were observed among the populations studied and the corresponding gnomAD population for 7.9% of the variants. In addition, in the 11 selected genes we uncovered 197 novel variants, among which 27 were loss-of-function. In conclusion, we provide with the landscape of actionable pharmacogenetic information contained in diagnostic exomes, that can be used preemptively in the clinics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.