Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35181593›Full record

ArticleCancer genomics & proteomics

Combination of Circulating Tumour DNA and

Ondrej Fiala, Jan Baxa, Martin Svaton, Lucie Benesova, Renata Ptackova, Tereza Halkova, Marek Minarik, Petr Hosek, Marcela Buresova, Jindrich Finek and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Liquid Biopsies and Molecular Imaging for Precise Cancer Management.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Circulating Tumor DNA and [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ondrej FialaDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic; fialao@fnplzen.cz fiala.o@centrum.cz.
Jan BaxaDepartment of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Martin SvatonDepartment of Pneumology and Phtiseology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Lucie BenesovaCenter for Applied Genomics of Solid Tumors, Genomac Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic.
Renata PtackovaCenter for Applied Genomics of Solid Tumors, Genomac Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tereza HalkovaCenter for Applied Genomics of Solid Tumors, Genomac Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marek MinarikElphogene, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr HosekLaboratory of Cancer Treatment and Tissue Regeneration, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Marcela BuresovaDepartment of Pneumology and Phtiseology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Jindrich FinekDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Jiri FerdaDepartment of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Milos PesekDepartment of Pneumology and Phtiseology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimCirculating tumour DNA (ctDNA) represents an emerging biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We focused on the combination of ctDNA and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the follow-up monitoring of advanced-stage NSCLC patients treated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsEighty-four patients were enrolled in this study.

resultsThere was a correlation of ctDNA with metabolic tumour volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and iodine concentration (IC) at baseline (p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.003) and at follow-up (p=0.006, p=0.002, p=0.001). The objective response was associated with follow-up ctDNA (p<0.001) and the change of all PET/CT parameters. ROC analyses showed that the combination of follow-up ctDNA with changes in SUVmax is very promising for the estimation of objective response and progression-free survival.

conclusionThe combination of ctDNA assessment with PET/CT is a promising approach for the follow-up monitoring of therapy response and prognosis estimation of advanced-stage NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCirculating Tumor DNALung NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18GlycolysisHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisProspective StudiesRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesTumor BurdenCirculating Tumor DNAFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsCirculating tumour DNAliquid biopsynon-small cell lung cancerPET/CTtherapy response

Identifiers

PMID35181593
PMCPMC8865037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.