Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35181388›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2022

Efficiently identifying individuals at high risk for treatment resistance in major depressive disorder using electronic health records.

Isaac Lage, Thomas H McCoy, Roy H Perlis, Finale Doshi-Velez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dimensional clinical phenotyping usingAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isaac LageHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, 29 Oxford Street, 1 Oxford St, Science Center, 316.04, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Thomas H McCoyCenter for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Roy H PerlisCenter for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: rperlis@mgh.harvard.edu.
Finale Doshi-VelezHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, 29 Oxford Street, 1 Oxford St, Science Center, 316.04, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: finale@seas.harvard.edu.

Funding

Data-driven subtyping in major depressive disorderR01MH123804 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PERLIS, ROY H. · 2021 to 2024
$3.1M
Natural language processing for characterizing psychopathologyR01MH106577 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PERLIS, ROY H. · 2016 to 2018
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106577NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the emergence of evidence-based treatments for treatment-resistant depression, strategies to identify individuals at greater risk for treatment resistance early in the course of illness could have clinical utility. We sought to develop and validate a model to predict treatment resistance in major depressive disorder using coded clinical data from the electronic health record.

methodsWe identified individuals from a large health system with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder receiving an index antidepressant prescription, and used a tree-based machine learning classifier to build a risk stratification model to identify those likely to experience treatment resistance. The resulting model was validated in a second health system.

resultsIn the second health system, the extra trees model yielded an AUC of 0.652 (95% CI: 0.623-0.682); with sensitivity constrained at 0.80, specificity was 0.358 (95% CI: 0.300-0.413). Lift in the top quintile was 1.99 (95% CI: 1.76-2.22). Including additional data for the 4 weeks following treatment initiation did not meaningfully improve model performance. LIMITATIONS: The extent to which these models generalize across additional health systems will require further investigation.

conclusionElectronic health records facilitated stratification of risk for treatment-resistant depression and demonstrated generalizability to a second health system. Efforts to improve upon such models using additional measures, and to understand their performance in real-world clinical settings, are warranted.

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantMajor Depressive DisorderAntidepressive AgentsElectronic Health RecordsHumansMachine LearningAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressantMachine learningPredictionRisk stratificationSSRITreatment-resistant

Identifiers

PMID35181388
PMCPMC9980713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.