ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2022
Integrated Analysis of Coexpression and Exome Sequencing to Prioritize Susceptibility Genes for Familial Cutaneous Melanoma.
Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disruption of CTCF binding by germline non-coding variants inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Flipping the script: Advances in understanding how and why P4-ATPases flip lipid across membranes.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2024Review
- Type IV P-Type ATPases: Recent Updates in Cancer Development, Progression, and Treatment.Cancers · 2023Review
- "ThermoTRP" Channel Expression in Cancers: Implications for Diagnosis and Prognosis (Practical Approach by a Pathologist).International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The application of whole-exome sequencing has led to the identification of high- and moderate-risk variants that contribute to cutaneous melanoma susceptibility. However, confirming disease-causing variants remains challenging. We applied a gene coexpression network analysis to prioritize the candidate genes identified from whole-exome sequencing of 34 melanoma-prone families, with at least three affected members sequenced per family (N = 119 cases). A coexpression network was constructed from genotype-tissue expression project, skin melanoma from the cancer genome atlas, and primary melanocyte cultures. We performed module-specific enrichment and focused on modules associated with pigmentation processes because they are the best-studied and most well-known risk factors for melanoma susceptibility. We found that pigmentation-associated modules across the four expression datasets examined were enriched for well-known melanoma susceptibility genes plus genes associated with pigmentation. We also used network properties to prioritize genes within pigmentation modules as candidate susceptibility genes. Integrating information from coexpression network analysis and variant prioritization, we identified 36 genes (such as DCT, TPCN2, TRPM1, ATP10A, and EPHA5) as potential melanoma risk genes in the families. Our approach also allowed us to link families with private gene mutations on the basis of gene coexpression patterns and thereby may provide an innovative perspective in gene identification in high-risk families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.