ReviewClinical biochemistry2023
Advances in molecular infectious diseases testing in the time of COVID-19.
Review in Clinical biochemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Topological data analysis and machine learning for COVID-19 detection in CT scan lung images.BMC biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Simplifying SARS-CoV-2 wastewater-based surveillance using an automated FDA EUA assay.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Tackling Infectious Diseases with Rapid Molecular Diagnosis and Innovative Prevention.Infectious disease reports · 2024Review
- Impact of relative humidity on SARS-CoV-2 RNA extraction using Nextractor automated extraction system.Journal of biological methods · 2024Article
- Flexible upscaling of laboratory PCR testing capacity at the Robert Koch Institute during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Virology journal · 2023Article
- SARS-CoV-2 self-test uptake and factors associated with self-testing during Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 waves in France, January to May 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a challenging event for laboratory medicine and diagnostics manufacturers. We have had to confront numerous unique and previously unthinkable issues on a daily basis in order to continue offering diagnostic testing for not only Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), but other testing that was significantly impacted by supply chain and staffing disruptions related to COVID-19. Out of this tremendously stressful and, at times, chaotic environment, decades of innovations and advances in testing methodologies and instrumentation became essential to handle the overwhelming volume of samples with clinically appropriate turn-around-time. Additionally, a number of novel testing approaches and technological innovations emerged to address laboratory and public health needs for widespread testing. In this review we consider both technological advances in infectious diseases testing and other innovations in sample collection, processing, automation, workflow, and testing that have embodied the laboratory response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.