SynthesisBritish journal of anaesthesia2022
Systematic review of retracted articles in critical care medicine.
Synthesis in British journal of anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic analysis of temporal trends, characteristics, and citations of retracted stem cell publications.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Guidelines needed for the use of AI in the preparation or review of IRB, IBC, and IACUC applications.Accountability in research · 2026Article
- Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anesthesiology research.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Article
- Editorial Commitment to Trust and Integrity in Science: Implications for Pain and Anesthesiology Research.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2025Article
- Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anaesthesiology research.Anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anesthesiology research.Pain reports · 2025Article
- Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: Implications for pain and anesthesiology research.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Editorial Commitment to Trust and Integrity in Science: Implications for Pain and Anesthesiology Research.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Article
- Editorial Commitment to Trust and Integrity in Science: Implications for Pain and Anesthesiology Research.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: Implications for pain and anesthesiology research.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2025Article
- Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anesthesiology research.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The trend and ripple effects of retractions in primary health care: A bibliometric analysis.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2024Article
- Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: Implications for pain and anesthesiology research.Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.