Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35180852›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Assessing Dutch women's experiences of labour and birth: adaptations and psychometric evaluations of the measures Mothers on Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, Mothers on Respect Index, and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0.

L L Peters, M S G van der Pijl, S Vedam, W S Barkema, M T van Lohuizen, D E M C Jansen, E I Feijen-de Jong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of Maternity Rights Perception: Impact of Maternal Care in Diverse Socio-Health Contexts.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

L L PetersDepartment of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. L.L.Peters@umcg.nl.
M S G van der PijlAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Midwifery Science AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S VedamBirth Place Laboratory, Division of Midwifery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
W S BarkemaDepartment of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
M T van LohuizenAVAG (Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen), Groningen, The Netherlands.
D E M C JansenDepartment of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
E I Feijen-de JongDepartment of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAcademie Verloskunde Amsterdam Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Mothers Autonomy in Decision Making Scale (MADM) assesses women's autonomy and role in decision making. The Mothers on Respect Index (MORi) asseses women's experiences of respect when interacting with their healthcare providers. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0 assesses the overall experience of childbirth (CEQ2.0). There are no validated Dutch measures of the quality of women's experiences in the intrapartum period. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of these measures in their Dutch translations.

methodsThe available Dutch versions of the MADM and MORi were adapted to assess experiences in the intrapartum period. The CEQ2.0 was translated by using forward-backward procedures. The three measures were included in an online survey including items on individual characteristics (i.e. maternal, birth, birth interventions). Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alphas. Mann-Whitney, Kruskal Wallis or Student T-tests were applied where appropriate, to assess discrimination between women who differed on individual characteristics (known group validity). We hypothesized that women who experienced pregnancy complications and birth interventions would have statistically lower scores on the MADM, MORi and CEQ2.0, compared with women who had healthy pregnancies and physiological births. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman Rank correlations between the MADM, MORi and/or CEQ2.0. We hypothesized moderate to strong correlations between these measures. Women's uptake of and feedback on the measures were tracked to assess acceptability and clarity.

resultsIn total 621 women were included in the cross sectional study. The calculated Cronbach's alphas for the MADM, MORi and CEQ, were ≥ 0.77. Knowngroup validity was confirmed through significant differences on all relevant individual characteristics, except for vaginal laceration repair. Spearman Rank correlations ranged from 0.46-0.80. In total 98% of the included women out of the eligible population completed the MADM and MORi for each healthcare professional they encountered during childbirth. The proportions of MADM and MORi-items which were difficult to complete ranged from 0.0-10.8%, 0.6-2.7%, respectively.

conclusionsThe results of our study showed that the Dutch version of the MADM, MORi and CEQ2.0 in Dutch are valid instruments that can be used to assess women's experiences in the intrapartum period.

Indexed as

Perinatal CarePsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHumansLabor, ObstetricNetherlandsParturitionPeripartum PeriodPersonal AutonomyPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsRespectChildbirthDecision making. RespectMidwiferyObstetricsPatient reported outcome measurePersonal autonomyPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID35180852
PMCPMC8857821
OpenAlexW4213347671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.