Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35180844›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Bacterial colonization at caesarean section defects in women of secondary infertility: an observational study.

Isabel Hsu, Leonard Hsu, Sonam Dorjee, Chao-Chin Hsu

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Isthmocele and Infertility.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabel Hsu *Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Leonard Hsu *Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sonam DorjeeTaiwan United Birth-Promoting Experts Fertility Clinic, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chao-Chin HsuDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. tube2363808@gmail.com.
Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology · AUNational Taiwan University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed childbearing has been noted in a high percentage of women with a previous Caesarean section (CS). Many women with CS scar defects (CSDs) present with clinical symptoms of irregular vaginal bleeding. The present study aimed to investigate bacterial colonies at CSDs in women suffering from secondary infertility.

methodsThis observational study included 363 women with secondary infertility who visited the Assisted Reproduction Unit between 2008 and 2013. Among them, 172 women with a previous CS and 191 women with no previous CS were approached. The women with a previous CS had their CS operations in the past 1 to 14 years, with a mean of 3.5 years. The presence of CSDs was detected by vaginal ultrasonography. Bacteriology cultures of specimens taken from the uterine niches in those with CSDs were collected during Day 7 to Day 10 of the follicular phase. Specimens were obtained from the endocervical canal for bacterial culture in those without CSDs. The main outcome measure was the detection of the growth of bacterial colonies.

resultsCSDs were found in 60.4% (96 of 159) of women with a previous CS. In women with a previous CS, bacterial colonies were identified in 89.6% (86 of 96) and 69.8% (44 of 63) of women with and without CSDs, respectively. In women with no previous CS, 49.7% (88 out of 177) of bacterial cultures of endocervical samples showed bacterial colony growth. Gram-positive cocci (P = 0.0017, odds ratio (OR) = 1.576, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -22.5 to - 5.4) and Gram-negative rods (P = 0.0016, OR = 1.74, CI - 20.8 to - 5.0) were the most commonly isolated bacteria and contributed to approximately 90% of all microorganisms found in those with a previous CS. In women with a previous CS, more Gram-negative rods were isolated (P = 0.01, OR = 1.765, CI - 27.2 to - 3.8), especially Pseudomonas species (P = 0.02, OR = 1.97, CI - 16.7 to - 1.0), in those with visible CSDs than in those without CSDs.

conclusionsBacterial colonization at CSDs was found in a high percentage of women with secondary infertility.

Indexed as

AdultBacteria, AerobicCesarean SectionCicatrixFemaleHumansInfertilityMiddle AgedTaiwanBacterial colonizationCaesarean section scar defect (CSD)Secondary infertilityUterine niche

Identifiers

PMID35180844
PMCPMC8857828
OpenAlexW4213222427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.