ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022
Dose Escalation Data from the Phase 1 Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Japanese Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Trial
- Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Small Cell Lung Cancer Cohort.Cancer research communications · 2024Trial
- E7389-LF as a first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic/advanced HER2-negative breast cancer: results from the phase 1 dose-expansion part of study 114.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Evolving phase I oncology trials in the precision medicine era: design, outcomes, and geographic access.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Phase 1b/2 study of the liposomal formulation of eribulin (E7389-LF) in combination with nivolumab: Results from the phase 2 esophageal cancer cohort.BJC reports · 2024Article
- The Role of CXCR3 in Nervous System-Related Diseases.Mediators of inflammation · 2024Review
- Phase Ib/II Study of a Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) plus Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: Results from Phase Ib.Cancer research communications · 2023Article
- Phase I Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF): Results from the Advanced Gastric Cancer Expansion Cohort.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023Article
- Suppression of alpha-tubulin acetylation potentiates therapeutic efficacy of Eribulin in liver cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe report the dose-escalation part of a phase I study of liposomal eribulin (E7389-LF) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors and no alternative standard therapy. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients ≥20 years old were enrolled. E7389-LF doses of 1.0 to 1.5 mg/m2 once every two weeks (Q2W) or 1.0 to 2.5 mg/m2 once every three weeks (Q3W) were planned. The primary objective was to determine the MTD by evaluating dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Secondary objectives included safety/tolerability assessments, objective response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival; serum biomarker assessment was an exploratory objective.
resultsTwenty-one patients were enrolled and treated; 12 in the Q3W group (1.0 mg/m2, n = 3; 1.5 mg/m2, n = 3; 2.0 mg/m2, n = 6) and 9 in the Q2W group (1.0 mg/m2, n=3; 1.5 mg/m2, n = 6). The Q3W and Q2W MTDs were 2.0 mg/m2 and 1.5 mg/m2, respectively. One patient receiving 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W had a DLT of grade 3 febrile neutropenia. The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (66.7% in Q3W and Q2W) and leukopenia (Q3W, 58.3%; Q2W, 33.3%). One patient in the Q3W group (2.0 mg/m2) and 3 in the Q2W group (1.0 mg/m2, n = 1; 1.5 mg/m2, n = 2) achieved a partial response [overall ORR, 19.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.4-41.9]. Endothelial [TEK receptor tyrosine kinase (TEK), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR3), platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM1)], vasculature (collagen IV), and immune-related [interferon gamma (IFNγ), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 11 (CXCL11), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10)] biomarker levels were increased.
conclusionsE7389-LF was well tolerated at 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W and 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W. Considering the toxicity profile of both regimens, the recommended dose was 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W. Expansion cohorts are ongoing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.