Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35180771›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Dose Escalation Data from the Phase 1 Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Japanese Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Jun Sato, Toshio Shimizu, Takafumi Koyama, Satoru Iwasa, Akihiko Shimomura, Shunsuke Kondo, Shigehisa Kitano, Kan Yonemori, Yutaka Fujiwara, Kenji Tamura and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phase II Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) in Combination with Nivolumab: Results from the Gastric Cancer Cohort.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Phase I Study of the Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF): Results from the Advanced Gastric Cancer Expansion Cohort.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jun SatoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9249-6522
Toshio ShimizuDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takafumi KoyamaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5807-8458
Satoru IwasaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiko ShimomuraDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2557-8170
Shunsuke KondoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigehisa KitanoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4041-8298
Kan YonemoriDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7624-7611
Yutaka FujiwaraDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6981-0800
Kenji TamuraDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takuya SuzukiJapan and Asia Clinical Development Department, Oncology Business Group, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Takao TakaseClinical Data Science Department, Medicine Development Center, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Reiko NagaiClinical Data Science Department, Medicine Development Center, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Kohei YamaguchiClinical Pharmacology Science Department, Medicine Development Center, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Taro SembaTsukuba Research Department, Oncology Business Group, Eisai Co., Ltd., Ibaraki, Japan.
Zi-Ming ZhaoTranslational Science, Oncology Business Group, Eisai Inc., Nutley, New Jersey.
Min RenBiostats, Oncology Business Group, Eisai Inc., Nutley, New Jersey.
Noboru YamamotoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0787-2851
National Cancer Centre Japan · JPEisai (Japan) · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPShimane University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe report the dose-escalation part of a phase I study of liposomal eribulin (E7389-LF) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors and no alternative standard therapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients ≥20 years old were enrolled. E7389-LF doses of 1.0 to 1.5 mg/m2 once every two weeks (Q2W) or 1.0 to 2.5 mg/m2 once every three weeks (Q3W) were planned. The primary objective was to determine the MTD by evaluating dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Secondary objectives included safety/tolerability assessments, objective response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival; serum biomarker assessment was an exploratory objective.

resultsTwenty-one patients were enrolled and treated; 12 in the Q3W group (1.0 mg/m2, n = 3; 1.5 mg/m2, n = 3; 2.0 mg/m2, n = 6) and 9 in the Q2W group (1.0 mg/m2, n=3; 1.5 mg/m2, n = 6). The Q3W and Q2W MTDs were 2.0 mg/m2 and 1.5 mg/m2, respectively. One patient receiving 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W had a DLT of grade 3 febrile neutropenia. The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (66.7% in Q3W and Q2W) and leukopenia (Q3W, 58.3%; Q2W, 33.3%). One patient in the Q3W group (2.0 mg/m2) and 3 in the Q2W group (1.0 mg/m2, n = 1; 1.5 mg/m2, n = 2) achieved a partial response [overall ORR, 19.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.4-41.9]. Endothelial [TEK receptor tyrosine kinase (TEK), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR3), platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM1)], vasculature (collagen IV), and immune-related [interferon gamma (IFNγ), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 11 (CXCL11), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10)] biomarker levels were increased.

conclusionsE7389-LF was well tolerated at 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W and 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W. Considering the toxicity profile of both regimens, the recommended dose was 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W. Expansion cohorts are ongoing.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkersChemokinesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFuransHumansJapanKetonesLigandsLiposomesMaximum Tolerated DosePolyether PolyketidesYoung AdultBiomarkersChemokineseribulinFuransKetonesLigandsLiposomesPolyether PolyketidesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID35180771
PMCPMC9365350
OpenAlexW4212791754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.