Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35180642›Full record

SynthesisPhysiotherapy2022

Home-based and remote functional exercise testing in cardiac conditions, during the covid-19 pandemic and beyond: a systematic review.

Rita Hwang, Teresa Fan, Rachel Bowe, Menaka Louis, Michelle Bertram, Norman R Morris, Julie Adsett

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Physiotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Rita HwangDepartment of Physiotherapy, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: r.hwang@uq.net.au.
Teresa FanLogan Chronic Disease Service, Logan Hospital, Meadowbrook, Logan, QLD 4131, Australia.
Rachel BoweCairns Hospital, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia.
Menaka LouisChronic Disease and Post-Acute Programs, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD, 4226, Australia.
Michelle BertramChronic Disease and Post-Acute Programs, Helensvale Community Health Centre, Helensvale, Gold Coast, QLD, 4212, Australia.
Norman R MorrisSchool of Allied Health Sciences and Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, Southport, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia; Allied Health Research Collaborative, The Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Chermside, Brisbane, QLD 4032, Australia.
Julie AdsettHeart Support Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.
Cairns Hospital · AUGold Coast Health · AUGold Coast Hospital · AUGriffith University · AULogan Hospital · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the change in healthcare to one that adopts a greater reliance on remote delivery, guidance regarding functional exercise testing, either in-person in the home or performed remotely, is urgently needed for people with cardiac conditions.

objectivesTo identify functional exercise tests that have been conducted in the home or remotely in patients with cardiac conditions. DATA SOURCES: A search was undertaken across four electronic databases and grey literature for English language publications without time restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies of any designs were selected if they reported an exercise test conducted at home or remotely in patients with cardiac conditions. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Studies were independently screened and graded by two reviewers according to the Downs and Black checklist. A narrative synthesis of the included studies was undertaken.

resultsFive studies (six articles) were included, with a total of 438 patients with cardiac conditions. Tests used at home or remotely were the 6-minute walk test (6MWT, five studies) and the timed up and go test (one study). No studies reported the use of step tests in the home or remotely. The 6MWTs were administered via a smartphone application, rope, videoconferencing and accelerometer and proved to be feasible, valid and reliable.

conclusionsDespite a marked demand for home-based exercise programs, the 6MWT remains the most commonly administered functional exercise test for people with cardiac conditions. Surprisingly few studies have explored alternative tests for this patient population that may be more suitable for home or remote performance. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO: CRD42020219512.

Indexed as

COVID-19Exercise TestHumansPandemicsPostural BalanceTime and Motion StudiesExercise testHeart diseaseRemote consultationTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35180642
PMCPMC8694378
OpenAlexW4200618658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.