Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35180617›Full record

Observational studyMultiple sclerosis and related disorders2022

Humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS CoV-2 vaccination in People with Multiple Sclerosis and NMOSD patients receiving immunomodulatory treatments.

H Bock, T Juretzek, R Handreka, J Ruhnau, M Löbel, K Reuner, H Peltroche, A Dressel

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with inflammatory immune-mediated diseases receiving immunosuppressive treatment.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H BockInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Carl-Thiem-Hospital Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany; Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH144AS, Scotland, UK.
T JuretzekInstitute of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Carl-Thiem-Hospital Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany.
R HandrekaDept. of Neurology, Carl-Thiem-Hospital Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany.
J RuhnauDept. of Neurology, Universitymedicine Greifswald, Greifswald Germany.
M LöbelClinical Trials Unit, Carl-Thiem-Hospital Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany.
K ReunerInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Carl-Thiem-Hospital Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany.
H PeltrocheInstitute of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Carl-Thiem-Hospital Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany.
A DresselDept. of Neurology, Carl-Thiem-Hospital Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany. Electronic address: a.dressel@ctk.de.
Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination against SARS CoV-2 results in excellent personal protection against a severe course of COVID19. In People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) vaccination efficacy may be reduced by immunomodulatory medications.

objectiveTo assess the vaccination induced cellular and humoral immune response in PwMS receiving disease modifying therapies.

methodsIn a monocentric observational study on PwMS and patients with Neuromyelitis optica we quantified the cellular and humoral immune responses to SARS CoV-2.

resultsPwMS receiving glatiramer acetate, Interferon-ß, Dimethylfumarate, Cladribine or Natalizumab had intact humoral and cellular immune responses following vaccination against SARS CoV-2. B-cell depleting therapies reduced B-cell responses but did not affect T cell responses. Sphingosin-1-Phospate (S1P) inhibitors strongly reduced humoral and cellular immune responses. There was a good agreement between the Interferon gamma release assay and the T-SPOT assay used to measure viral antigen induced T-cell responses.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that S1P inhibitors impair the cellular and humoral immune response in SARS CoV-2 vaccination, whereas patients receiving B-cell depleting therapies mount an intact cellular immune response. These data can support clinicians in counselling their PwMS and NMOSD patients during the COVID 19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Multiple SclerosisAntibodies, ViralHumansImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralVaccinationAntibodies, ViralCellular immune responseCOVID 19Humoral immune responseMultiple Sclerosis therapySARS CoV2Vaccination

Identifiers

PMID35180617
PMCPMC8783535
OpenAlexW4213031287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.