Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35180452›Full record

ArticleClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)2022

Validity of four commercially available metabolic carts for assessing resting metabolic rate and respiratory exchange ratio in non-ventilated humans.

J M A Alcantara, J E Galgani, L Jurado-Fasoli, M Dote-Montero, E Merchan-Ramirez, E Ravussin, J R Ruiz, G Sanchez-Delgado

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07462806 (Indirect Calorimetry Measurement in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit's Smallest Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07462806 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Indirect Calorimetry Measurement in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit's Smallest Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2026 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsPediatric Critical IllnessArmsQ-NRG+
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Predicting resting energy expenditure: a critical appraisal.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A nutritional intervention for moderate altitude endurance preparation: A case report.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J M A AlcantaraPROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity" Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain. Electronic address: alcantarajma@ugr.es.
J E GalganiDepartment of Health Sciences, Nutrition and Dietetics Career, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Department of Nutrition, Diabetes and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
L Jurado-FasoliPROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity" Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain.
M Dote-MonteroPROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity" Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain.
E Merchan-RamirezPROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity" Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain.
E RavussinPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.
J R RuizPROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity" Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, ibs.Granada, Granada, Spain.
G Sanchez-DelgadoPROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity" Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain; Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAININGP30DK026687 · NIDDK · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI Anthony W Ferrante, DYMPNA GALLAGHER · 1986 to 2026
$33.0M
Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Sujoy Ghosh · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026687NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe validity of most commercially available metabolic cart is mostly unknown. Thus, we aimed to determine the accuracy, precision, within-subject reproducibility, and concordance of RMR and RER measured by four commercially available metabolic carts [Cosmed Q-NRG, Vyaire Vyntus CPX, Maastricht Instruments Omnical, and Medgraphics Ultima CardiO2]. Further, we studied whether a previously proposed simulation-based post-calorimetric calibration of cart readouts [individual calibration control evaluation (ICcE)] modify the RMR and RER reproducibility and concordance.

methodsThree experiments simulating different RMR and RER by controlled pure gas (N

resultsThe Omnical presented the lowest measurement error for RER (Omnical = 1.7 ± 0.9%; Vyntus = 4.5 ± 2.0%; Q-NRG = 6.6 ± 1.9%; Ultima = 6.8 ± 6.5%) and EE (Omnical = 1.5 ± 0.5%; Q-NRG = 2.5 ± 1.3%; Ultima = 10.7 ± 11.0%; Vyntus = 13.8 ± 5.0%) in all in vitro experiments (controlled pure gas infusions and methanol burns). In humans, the 4 metabolic carts provided discordant RMR and RER estimations (all P < 0.001). No differences were detected in RMR within-subject reproducibility (P = 0.058; Q-NRG inter-day coefficient of variance = 3.6 ± 2.5%; Omnical = 4.8 ± 3.5%; Vyntus = 5.0 ± 5.6%; Ultima = 5.7 ± 4.6%), although the Ultima CardiO2 provided larger RER inter-day differences (4.6 ± 3.5%) than the others carts (P = 0.001; Omnical = 1.9 ± 1.7%; Vyntus = 2.1 ± 1.3%; Q-NRG = 2.4 ± 2.1%). The ICcE procedure did not modify the RMR or RER concordance and did not reduce the inter-day differences in any of the carts.

conclusionsThe 4 metabolic carts provided discordant measurements of RMR and RER. Overall, the Omnical provides more accurate and precise estimations of RMR and RER than the Q-NRG, Vyntus and Ultima CardiO2, and might be considered the best for assessing RMR and RER in non-ventilated humans. Finally, our results do not support the use of an ICcE procedure.

Indexed as

Basal MetabolismMethanolAdultCalorimetry, IndirectEnergy MetabolismFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultMethanolBasal metabolic rateIndirect calorimetryReliability

Identifiers

PMID35180452
PMCPMC9616127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.