Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35180220›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Specificity of Loxosceles α clade phospholipase D enzymes for choline-containing lipids: Role of a conserved aromatic cage.

Emmanuel E Moutoussamy, Qaiser Waheed, Greta J Binford, Hanif M Khan, Shane M Moran, Anna R Eitel, Matthew H J Cordes, Nathalie Reuter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spider venom phospholipase D toxin structure: Interfacial binding site, mechanism, activation, and head group preference.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dissecting peripheral protein-membrane interfaces.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmanuel E MoutoussamyComputational Biology Unit, Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9194-9881
Qaiser WaheedComputational Biology Unit, Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7566-2506
Greta J BinfordDepartment of Biology, Lewis and Clark College, Portland, Oregon, United States.
Hanif M KhanComputational Biology Unit, Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5301-7234
Shane M MoranDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Arizona, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9140-0522
Anna R EitelDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Arizona, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0050-9259
Matthew H J CordesDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Arizona, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5763-1669
Nathalie ReuterComputational Biology Unit, Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3649-7675
University of Bergen · NOUniversity of Arizona · USLewis & Clark College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spider venom GDPD-like phospholipases D (SicTox) have been identified to be one of the major toxins in recluse spider venom. They are divided into two major clades: the α clade and the β clade. Most α clade toxins present high activity against lipids with choline head groups such as sphingomyelin, while activities in β clade toxins vary and include preference for substrates containing ethanolamine headgroups (Sicarius terrosus, St_βIB1). A structural comparison of available structures of phospholipases D (PLDs) reveals a conserved aromatic cage in the α clade. To test the potential influence of the aromatic cage on membrane-lipid specificity we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the binding of several PLDs onto lipid bilayers containing choline headgroups; two SicTox from the α clade, Loxosceles intermedia αIA1 (Li_αIA) and Loxosceles laeta αIII1 (Ll_αIII1), and one from the β clade, St_βIB1. The simulation results reveal that the aromatic cage captures a choline-headgroup and suggest that the cage plays a major role in lipid specificity. We also simulated an engineered St_βIB1, where we introduced the aromatic cage, and this led to binding with choline-containing lipids. Moreover, a multiple sequence alignment revealed the conservation of the aromatic cage among the α clade PLDs. Here, we confirmed that the i-face of α and β clade PLDs is involved in their binding to choline and ethanolamine-containing bilayers, respectively. Furthermore, our results suggest a major role in choline lipid recognition of the aromatic cage of the α clade PLDs. The MD simulation results are supported by in vitro liposome binding assay experiments.

Indexed as

Phospholipase DSpider VenomsCholineEthanolaminePhosphoric Diester HydrolasesSphingomyelinsCholineEthanolaminePhospholipase DPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesSphingomyelinsSpider Venoms

Identifiers

PMID35180220
PMCPMC8893692
OpenAlexW4220813107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.