Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35180214›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Towards the prediction of non-peptidic epitopes.

Paul F Zierep, Randi Vita, Nina Blazeska, Aurélien F A Moumbock, Jason A Greenbaum, Bjoern Peters, Stefan Günther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Interaction Space.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  2. Prediction of Linear B Cell Epitopes in Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul F ZierepInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2982-388X
Randi VitaCenter for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8957-7612
Nina BlazeskaCenter for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6604-0019
Aurélien F A MoumbockInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6034-2016
Jason A GreenbaumCenter for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1381-0390
Bjoern PetersCenter for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8457-6693
Stefan GüntherInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3744-189X

Funding

IMMUNE EPITOPE AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM: Transplantation of organs, tissues and cells 75N93019C00001 · NIAID · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI WILSON, STEPHEN · 2019 to 2025
$23.1M
NIAID NIH HHS 75N93019C00001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-silico methods for the prediction of epitopes can support and improve workflows for vaccine design, antibody production, and disease therapy. So far, the scope of B cell and T cell epitope prediction has been directed exclusively towards peptidic antigens. Nevertheless, various non-peptidic molecular classes can be recognized by immune cells. These compounds have not been systematically studied yet, and prediction approaches are lacking. The ability to predict the epitope activity of non-peptidic compounds could have vast implications; for example, for immunogenic risk assessment of the vast number of drugs and other xenobiotics. Here we present the first general attempt to predict the epitope activity of non-peptidic compounds using the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) as a source for positive samples. The molecules stored in the Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) database were chosen as background samples. The molecules were clustered into eight homogeneous molecular groups, and classifiers were built for each cluster with the aim of separating the epitopes from the background. Different molecular feature encoding schemes and machine learning models were compared against each other. For those models where a high performance could be achieved based on simple decision rules, the molecular features were then further investigated. Additionally, the findings were used to build a web server that allows for the immunogenic investigation of non-peptidic molecules (http://tools-staging.iedb.org/np_epitope_predictor). The prediction quality was tested with samples from independent evaluation datasets, and the implemented method received noteworthy Receiver Operating Characteristic-Area Under Curve (ROC-AUC) values, ranging from 0.69-0.96 depending on the molecule cluster.

Indexed as

Epitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteArea Under CurvePeptidesROC CurveEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocytePeptides

Identifiers

PMID35180214
PMCPMC8893639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.