Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35179971›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022

Prostate MRI quality: clinical impact of the PI-QUAL score in prostate cancer diagnostic work-up.

Eleftherios Karanasios, Iztok Caglic, Jeries P Zawaideh, Tristan Barrett

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06482489 (Comparing Prostate Cancer Screening Between Standardized 3T MRI Screening Protocol and Low-Field MRI in a Prospective Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06482489 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparing Prostate Cancer Screening Between Standardized 3T MRI Screening Protocol and Low-Field MRI in a Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Lausanne HospitalsRan2024 to 2025Enrolled74ConditionsProstate CancerArmsSiemens Magnetom Free.Max 0.55T (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany).
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eleftherios KaranasiosDepartment of Radiology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5700-406X
Iztok CaglicDepartment of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jeries P ZawaidehDepartment of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Tristan BarrettDepartment of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the reproducibility and impact of prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) scores in a clinical cohort undergoing prostate multiparametric MRI.

methodsPI-QUAL scores were independently recorded by three radiologists (two senior, one junior). Readers also recorded whether MRI was sufficient to rule-in/out cancer and if repeat imaging was required. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Cohen's κ. PI-QUAL scores were further correlated to PI-RADS score, number of biopsy procedures, and need for repeat imaging.

resultsImage quality was sufficient (≥PI-QUAL-3) in 237/247 (96%) and optimal (≥PI-QUAL-4) in 206/247 (83%) of males undergoing 3T-MRI. Overall PI-QUAL scores showed moderate inter-reader agreement for senior (

conclusionHigher PI-QUAL scores for image quality are associated with decreased uncertainty in MRI decision-making and improved efficiency of diagnostic pathway delivery. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study demonstrates moderate inter-reader agreement for PI-QUAL scoring and validates the score in a clinical setting, showing correlation of image quality to certainty of decision making and clinical outcomes of repeat imaging and biopsy of low-to-intermediate risk cases.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35179971
PMCPMC10993954
OpenAlexW4213233458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.