Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35179897›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2022

Local Kernel Regression and Neural Network Approaches to the Conformational Landscapes of Oligopeptides.

Raimon Fabregat, Alberto Fabrizio, Edgar A Engel, Benjamin Meyer, Veronika Juraskova, Michele Ceriotti, Clemence Corminboeuf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raimon Fabregat
Edgar A EngelLaboratory of Computational Science and Modeling, IMX, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Benjamin Meyer
Veronika Juraskova
Michele CeriottiLaboratory of Computational Science and Modeling, IMX, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2571-2832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of machine learning to theoretical chemistry has made it possible to combine the accuracy of quantum chemical energetics with the thorough sampling of finite-temperature fluctuations. To reach this goal, a diverse set of methods has been proposed, ranging from simple linear models to kernel regression and highly nonlinear neural networks. Here we apply two widely different approaches to the same, challenging problem: the sampling of the conformational landscape of polypeptides at finite temperature. We develop a local kernel regression (LKR) coupled with a supervised sparsity method and compare it with a more established approach based on Behler-Parrinello type neural networks. In the context of the LKR, we discuss how the supervised selection of the reference pool of environments is crucial to achieve accurate potential energy surfaces at a competitive computational cost and leverage the locality of the model to infer which chemical environments are poorly described by the DFTB baseline. We then discuss the relative merits of the two frameworks and perform Hamiltonian-reservoir replica-exchange Monte Carlo sampling and metadynamics simulations, respectively, to demonstrate that both frameworks can achieve converged and transferable sampling of the conformational landscape of complex and flexible biomolecules with comparable accuracy and computational cost.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationNeural Networks, ComputerMachine LearningMolecular ConformationOligopeptidesOligopeptides

Identifiers

PMID35179897
PMCPMC8908737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.