Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35179788›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2022

Malignant phyllodes tumor and primary breast sarcoma; distinct rare tumors of the breast.

Lily Gutnik, Yi Ren, Samantha M Thomas, Jennifer K Plichta, Rachel A Greenup, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju, E Shelley Hwang, Laura H Rosenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lily GutnikDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8674-7655
Yi RenDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Samantha M ThomasDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jennifer K PlichtaDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Rachel A GreenupDepartment of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Oluwadamilola M FayanjuDepartment of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
E Shelley HwangDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Laura H RosenbergerDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6829-6747

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN N. NORTON · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Using Modifiable Risk Factors to Predict Inferior Care and Survival after Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Novel Approach to Addressing Health DisparitiesK08CA241390 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FAYANJU, OLUWADAMILOLA M. · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA241390NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant phyllodes (MP) and primary breast sarcomas (PBS) are rare neoplasms with overlapping histopathologic features. We compared overall survival (OS) and estimated the association of surgery and therapies with OS.

methodsWe utilized the National Cancer Database (2004-2016). Patients without surgery, unknown surgery, or margins, or Stage IV disease were excluded. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted OS, respectively.

resultsA total of 3209 (59.5%) MP, and 2185 (40.5%) PBS were identified. Despite a larger median tumor size in MP (46 vs. 40 mm PBS, p < 0.001), lumpectomy rate was higher for MP (52.9% vs. 27.0% PBS, p < 0.001). Compared to MP, PBS patients more frequently received radiation (28.9% vs. 24%), and chemotherapy (28.1% vs. 4%), both p < 0.001. Unadjusted OS was lower for PBS (57% vs. 85% MP, log-rank p < 0.001). PBS (vs. MP) had persistently worse survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.69-2.31) after adjustment. Receipt of adjuvant therapies was not associated with OS (either neoplasm); however, lumpectomy was associated with improved OS (vs. mastectomy) for both PBS (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.50-0.75) and MP (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.53-0.81). Positive margins had no association with OS for MP (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.75-1.60), but was associated with worse survival for PBS (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.82-3.02). DISCUSSION: We found significant survival differences between MP and PBS, with PBS having a consistently worse OS. Our findings support surgery as the mainstay of treatment for both tumor types and suggest that lumpectomy may be a reasonable option for select patients without compromising outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPhyllodes TumorBreastFemaleHumansMargins of ExcisionMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm Stagingbreastoutcomesoverall survivalphyllodessarcoma

Identifiers

PMID35179788
PMCPMC8995353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.