Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35179673›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2022

Italian translation and cross-cultural validation of an assessment tool for participation in stroke survivors: the Frenchay Activities Index.

Laura Antonucci, Carmen Barbato, Leonardo Pellicciari, Anita Paperini, Ines Hochleitner, Chiara Castagnoli, Sonia Verdesca, Giulia Lucidi, Sara Marignani, Silvia Pancani and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06884553 (Effects of Robot-assistED Rehabilitation Versus OccupatIonal Therapy on the Functional Recovery of the Upper Limb in PatiEnts with Chronic STroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06884553 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Robot-assistED Rehabilitation Versus OccupatIonal Therapy on the Functional Recovery of the Upper Limb in PatiEnts with Chronic STroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of FlorenceRan2023 to 2025Enrolled72ConditionsChronic StrokeArmsRobotic therapy (Gloreha Sinfonia system), Occupational therapy, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura AntonucciPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Carmen BarbatoIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Leonardo PellicciariIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy. leonardo.pellicciari@gmail.com.
Anita PaperiniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Ines HochleitnerIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Chiara CastagnoliIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Sonia VerdescaIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Giulia LucidiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Sara MarignaniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Silvia PancaniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Benedetta BasagniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Claudio MacchiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Francesca CecchiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeParticipation needs to be assessed objectively, to state accurate rehabilitation objectives. The Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) is a widely used tool to measure participation in stroke patients. To date, no cross-culturally validated Italian version of FAI is available. This study provides a translation and cross-cultural adaptation of FAI into Italian, assessing its validity and reliability in sub-acute stroke patients.

methodsAccording to international guidelines, a multistep translation and cultural adaptation protocol of forward and backward translations was conducted by qualified linguists and independent native English translators and revised by a healthcare committee. Patients admitted to intensive inpatient rehabilitation after stroke were recruited. Structural validity, reliability (internal consistency, inter- and intra-rater reliability and measurement error), and construct validity were studied.

resultsOne hundred and seventy-three patients were included in this study. No significant observations in terms of comprehensibility and conceptual equivalence of the FAI Italian version emerged. The exploratory factorial analysis revealed the presence of two subscales (i.e., domestic chores and work/leisure). The internal consistency resulted good for the first and second subscale (α = 0.821 and 0.716, respectively). Intra- and inter-reliability showed an ICC > 0.90 for both subscales. SEM = 5.75% and 2.33% and MDC = 15.85% and 6.48% were found for the first and second subscale, respectively. Construct validity of first subscale was satisfactory, as 100.0% a priori hypotheses were met, while for the second subscale it was moderate, as 66.6% a priori hypotheses were respected.

conclusionFAI-I provides a tool for professionals to measure participation in Italian stroke patients in health and social care settings.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationCross-Cultural ComparisonHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsTranslationsOutcome assessment, HealthcarePatient outcome assessmentPsychometricsReproducibility of resultsValidation studies

Identifiers

PMID35179673
OpenAlexW4213084679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.