Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35179557›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

Comparison of 16S rDNA Amplicon Sequencing With the Culture Method for Diagnosing Causative Pathogens in Bacterial Corneal Infections.

Na An, Changhao Wang, Xiuhong Dou, Xianning Liu, Jie Wu, Yan Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Na AnDepartment of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi'an No.1 Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Changhao WangSchool of Life Science, Northwest University, Xi'an, China.
Xiuhong DouSchool of Life Science, Northwest University, Xi'an, China.
Xianning LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi'an No.1 Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Jie WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi'an No.1 Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Yan ChengDepartment of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi'an No.1 Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Northwest University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to explore if 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing can improve the conventional diagnosis of causative pathogens for bacterial corneal infection.

methodsCorneal scraping and conjunctiva and eyelid margin swab samples from infected eyes of patients diagnosed with "bacterial corneal infection" and conjunctiva and eyelid margin swab samples from a random eye of healthy participants were collected. Each swab was used for both aerobic and anaerobic cultures and 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. The V3 to V4 region of the 16S rDNA was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 Sequencing Platform.

resultsThe overall culture positivity rate for all 72 samples was 69% (72% in the bacterial keratitis group and 67% in the healthy control group), whereas 1719 operational taxonomic units in total were generated using 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing with each sample showing 123 to 337 different genera. Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Propionibacterium, and Micrococcus most frequently appeared in culture, whereas Streptococcus, Acinetobacter, and Lactobacillus were the most common genera, with large ratios in 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. The causative pathogens detected by the two methods were inconsistent for most samples, except for several corneal samples.

conclusionsWe suggest that a combination of different techniques, such as clinical observation, microscopic analysis, culture, and next-generation sequencing techniques including 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing, should be used to comprehensively analyze pathogens in corneal and external ocular infections. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This paper uses a basic research methodology for studying the microbiome in ocular samples to help improve the diagnostic accuracy of corneal and external ocular infections.

Indexed as

Eye Infections, BacterialKeratitisBacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID35179557
PMCPMC8859490
OpenAlexW4213056359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.