ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022
Comparison of 16S rDNA Amplicon Sequencing With the Culture Method for Diagnosing Causative Pathogens in Bacterial Corneal Infections.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying and quantifying ESKAPEE pathogens in and around sinks in high burden hospitals.The Journal of hospital infection · 2026Observational
- Identifying and quantifying ESKAPEE pathogens in and around sinks in high burden hospitals.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Multi-cohort analysis identifying core ocular surface microbiome and bacterial alterations in eye diseases.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Sequencing the ocular surface microbiome: a review of methodological practices and considerations.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Conjunctival microbiota variations in a subset of middle-aged and elderly individuals from Beijing, China.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Enhancing Clinical Utility: Utilization of International Standards and Guidelines for Metagenomic Sequencing in Infectious Disease Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Microbiological culture versus 16S/18S rRNA gene PCR-sanger sequencing for infectious keratitis: a three-arm, diagnostic cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Alterations of conjunctival microbiota associated with orthokeratology lens wearing in myopic children.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Fungal dysbiosis and decreased tear mucin at the conjunctiva in patients with conjunctival mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Establishment and Validation of a New Analysis Strategy for the Study of Plant Endophytic Microorganisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Metagenomic nanopore sequencing of ocular microbiome in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Achieving diagnostic excellence for infectious keratitis: A future roadmap.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to explore if 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing can improve the conventional diagnosis of causative pathogens for bacterial corneal infection.
methodsCorneal scraping and conjunctiva and eyelid margin swab samples from infected eyes of patients diagnosed with "bacterial corneal infection" and conjunctiva and eyelid margin swab samples from a random eye of healthy participants were collected. Each swab was used for both aerobic and anaerobic cultures and 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. The V3 to V4 region of the 16S rDNA was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 Sequencing Platform.
resultsThe overall culture positivity rate for all 72 samples was 69% (72% in the bacterial keratitis group and 67% in the healthy control group), whereas 1719 operational taxonomic units in total were generated using 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing with each sample showing 123 to 337 different genera. Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Propionibacterium, and Micrococcus most frequently appeared in culture, whereas Streptococcus, Acinetobacter, and Lactobacillus were the most common genera, with large ratios in 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. The causative pathogens detected by the two methods were inconsistent for most samples, except for several corneal samples.
conclusionsWe suggest that a combination of different techniques, such as clinical observation, microscopic analysis, culture, and next-generation sequencing techniques including 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing, should be used to comprehensively analyze pathogens in corneal and external ocular infections. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This paper uses a basic research methodology for studying the microbiome in ocular samples to help improve the diagnostic accuracy of corneal and external ocular infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.