Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35179554›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2022

Identifying the Retinal Layers Linked to Human Contrast Sensitivity Via Deep Learning.

Foroogh Shamsi, Rong Liu, Cynthia Owsley, MiYoung Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of contrast sensitivity with vessel density and functional parameters in different stages of glaucoma.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Schizophrenia in Translation: Why the Eye?Schizophrenia bulletin · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Foroogh ShamsiDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Rong LiuDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Cynthia OwsleyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
MiYoung KwonDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG022838 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BALL, KARLENE K · 2003 to 2020
$5.7M
Perceptual mechanisms underlying reading difficulties in glaucomaR01EY027857 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KWON, MIYOUNG · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027857NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Luminance contrast is the fundamental building block of human spatial vision. Therefore contrast sensitivity, the reciprocal of contrast threshold required for target detection, has been a barometer of human visual function. Although retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are known to be involved in contrast coding, it still remains unknown whether the retinal layers containing RGCs are linked to a person's contrast sensitivity (e.g., Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity) and, if so, to what extent the retinal layers are related to behavioral contrast sensitivity. Thus the current study aims to identify the retinal layers and features critical for predicting a person's contrast sensitivity via deep learning. Methods: Data were collected from 225 subjects including individuals with either glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, or normal vision. A deep convolutional neural network trained to predict a person's Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity from structural retinal images measured with optical coherence tomography was used. Then, activation maps that represent the critical features learned by the network for the output prediction were computed. Results: The thickness of both ganglion cell and inner plexiform layers, reflecting RGC counts, were found to be significantly correlated with contrast sensitivity (r = 0.26 ∼ 0.58, Ps < 0.001 for different eccentricities). Importantly, the results showed that retinal layers containing RGCs were the critical features the network uses to predict a person's contrast sensitivity (an average R2 = 0.36 ± 0.10). Conclusions: The findings confirmed the structure and function relationship for contrast sensitivity while highlighting the role of RGC density for human contrast sensitivity.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overContrast SensitivityFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetinal NeuronsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID35179554
PMCPMC8859491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.