Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35179497›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Impact of a Conformité Européenne (CE) Certification-Marked Medical Software Sensor on COVID-19 Pandemic Progression Prediction: Register-Based Study Using Machine Learning Methods.

Leevi Limingoja, Kari Antila, Vesa Jormanainen, Joel Röntynen, Vilma Jägerroos, Leena Soininen, Hanna Nordlund, Kristian Vepsäläinen, Risto Kaikkonen, Tea Lallukka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leevi LimingojaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7437-5900
Kari AntilaSolita Oy, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2896-7323
Vesa JormanainenDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1906-8043
Joel RöntynenSolita Oy, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9330-5684
Vilma JägerroosSolita Oy, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-7467
Leena SoininenDigifinland Oy, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2879-5805
Hanna NordlundIT Centre for Science, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9191-1915
Kristian VepsäläinenHealth and Social Service System Research, Welfare State Research and Reform, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6601-7935
Risto KaikkonenSolita Oy, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8218-5480
Tea LallukkaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3841-3129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address the current COVID-19 and any future pandemic, we need robust, real-time, and population-scale collection and analysis of data. Rapid and comprehensive knowledge on the trends in reported symptoms in populations provides an earlier window into the progression of viral spread, and helps to predict the needs and timing of professional health care.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to use a Conformité Européenne (CE)-marked medical online symptom checker service, Omaolo, and validate the data against the national demand for COVID-19-related care to predict the pandemic progression in Finland.

methodsOur data comprised real-time Omaolo COVID-19 symptom checker responses (414,477 in total) and daily admission counts in nationwide inpatient and outpatient registers provided by the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare from March 16 to June 15, 2020 (the first wave of the pandemic in Finland). The symptom checker responses provide self-triage information input to a medically qualified algorithm that produces a personalized probability of having COVID-19, and provides graded recommendations for further actions. We trained linear regression and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models together with F-score and mutual information feature preselectors to predict the admissions once a week, 1 week in advance.

resultsOur models reached a mean absolute percentage error between 24.2% and 36.4% in predicting the national daily patient admissions. The best result was achieved by combining both Omaolo and historical patient admission counts. Our best predictor was linear regression with mutual information as the feature preselector.

conclusionsAccurate short-term predictions of COVID-19 patient admissions can be made, and both symptom check questionnaires and daily admissions data contribute to the accuracy of the predictions. Thus, symptom checkers can be used to estimate the progression of the pandemic, which can be considered when predicting the health care burden in a future pandemic.

Indexed as

admission dataCOVID-19COVID-19 forecastingdigital healthhealth carehealth datahealth technologyhealth technology assessmentmachine learningonline symptom checkerpandemicviral spread

Identifiers

PMID35179497
PMCPMC8972109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.