Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35179486›Full record

RevieweLife2022

Sex differences and sex bias in human circadian and sleep physiology research.

Manuel Spitschan, Nayantara Santhi, Amrita Ahluwalia, Dorothee Fischer, Lilian Hunt, Natasha A Karp, Francis Lévi, Inés Pineda-Torra, Parisa Vidafar, Rhiannon White

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Light and sex modifybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Hair Follicles as a Critical Model for Monitoring the Circadian Clock.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Manuel SpitschanDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8572-9268
Nayantara SanthiDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4568-1447
Amrita AhluwaliaWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7626-6399
Dorothee FischerGerman Aerospace Center, Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Sleep and Human Factors Research, Köln, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2122-3938
Lilian HuntWellcome Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0319-7764
Natasha A KarpData Sciences and Quantitative Biology, Discovery Science, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8404-2907
Francis LéviWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1364-7463
Inés Pineda-TorraCentre for Cardiometabolic and Vascular Science, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7349-2208
Parisa VidafarSleep and Circadian Research Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3990-1047
Rhiannon WhiteDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8175-3586
AstraZeneca (Australia) · AUDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) · DENorthumbria University · GBOffice of Diversity and Inclusion · USQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 204686/Z/16/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence shows that sex differences impact many facets of human biology. Here we review and discuss the impact of sex on human circadian and sleep physiology, and we uncover a data gap in the field investigating the non-visual effects of light in humans. A virtual workshop on the biomedical implications of sex differences in sleep and circadian physiology led to the following imperatives for future research: i) design research to be inclusive and accessible; ii) implement recruitment strategies that lead to a sex-balanced sample; iii) use data visualization to grasp the effect of sex; iv) implement statistical analyses that include sex as a factor and/or perform group analyses by sex, where possible; v) make participant-level data open and available to facilitate future meta-analytic efforts.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsSexismCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansMaleSleepchronobiologycircadian physiologyequality diversity inclusionhumanscience forumsex differencessleep

Identifiers

PMID35179486
PMCPMC8963875
OpenAlexW4212924293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.