Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35179185›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Associations of Total Protein or Animal Protein Intake and Animal Protein Sources with Risk of Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.

Farzaneh Asoudeh, Sepide Talebi, Ahmad Jayedi, Wolfgang Marx, Mohammad Taghi Najafi, Hamed Mohammadi

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of diet on renal stone formation.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Farzaneh AsoudehDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-376X
Sepide TalebiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad JayediSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4231-3147
Wolfgang MarxDeakin University, IMPACT-The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Food & Mood Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Mohammad Taghi NajafiNephrology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamed MohammadiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2046-7356
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRBarwon Health · AUSemnan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted the present systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association of total protein, animal protein, and animal protein sources with risk of kidney stones in the general population. A literature search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE up to July 2021. We assessed the credibility of evidence based on NutriGrade scoring system. A total of 14 prospective cohort studies were included. A positive association was observed between higher intake of nondairy animal protein (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.20; I2 = 0%, n = 4), total meat and meat products (RR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.38; I2 = 13%, n = 3), and processed meat (RR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.51; I2 = 0%, n = 2) with risk of kidney stones. There was an inverse association between higher intake of dairy protein and risk of kidney stones (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.99; I2 = 0%, n = 4). Moreover, each 100-gincrement of red meat intake was significantly associated with increased risk of kidney stones (RR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.13, 1.71). According to the NutriGrade scoring system, the credibility of evidence for most of the exposures was rated as low. We found some kind of publication bias in the association of animal protein intake and risk of kidney stones, according to Egger's and Begg's tests. In the sensitivity analysis of processed meat as well as dairy consumption with risk of kidney stones we observed in each individual analysis, 1 study changed the overall estimate. Further observational studies are needed to confirm the present results. The protocol of the present study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42021230125: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).

Indexed as

Animal Proteins, DietaryKidney CalculiMeatAnimalsHumansProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAnimal Proteins, Dietaryanimal proteindairyfishkidney stonesmeatmeta-analysisnutritionpoultrysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35179185
PMCPMC9156392
OpenAlexW4212918802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.