Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35179177›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2022

Interactive Beliefs about Genes and Behavior Predict Improved Sun Protection Following Melanoma Genetic Counseling.

Lisa G Aspinwall, Danielle M Drummond, Tammy K Stump, Wendy K Kohlmann, Sancy A Leachman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa G AspinwallDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5225-1210
Danielle M DrummondDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Tammy K StumpDepartment of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Wendy K KohlmannHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Sancy A LeachmanDepartment of Dermatology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
University of Utah · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE-UL1: BPCAUL1RR025764 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2008 to 2011
$19.4M
University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science-UL1UL1TR000105 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2012 to 2013
$5.1M
Impact of Melanoma Genetic Testing on Health Cognitions and Prevention BehaviorsR01CA158322 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ASPINWALL, LISA G, LEACHMAN, SANCY ANN · 2011 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000105NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035141NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158322NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about how members of cancer-prone families think about genetic determinism and whether personal behavior can amplify or counter genetic risk for disease. PURPOSE: Understanding how people think about the impact of personal behavior on disease risk may inform communications about genetic risks and their management.

methodsWe assessed three sets of beliefs about the impact of behavior on genetic risk-interactive (unhealthful behaviors can amplify genetic risk), subtractive (healthful behaviors can reduce genetic risk), and deterministic (genes primarily determine health outcomes)-among 114 unaffected members of melanoma-prone families receiving genetic counseling (51.6% men, average age = 35.3). We examined whether these beliefs predicted changes in perceived control, motivation to manage melanoma risk, and sun-protection behavior one year later.

resultsParticipants strongly endorsed interactive and subtractive beliefs, but not deterministic beliefs. These beliefs generally did not change, even among those who received positive CDKN2A/p16 genetic test results conferring up to 76% lifetime melanoma risk. Controlling for age, sex, education, skin type, and genetic test result, interactive beliefs predicted sustained increases in perceptions of personal control, motivation to reduce sun exposure, use of multiple sun-protection methods, and reduction in objectively assessed tanning at the wrist one year following genetic counseling. Subtractive beliefs predicted increased personal control, motivation to manage risk, and sunscreen use, while deterministic beliefs were generally unrelated to outcomes.

conclusionsAmong people at highly elevated hereditary cancer risk, beliefs that unhealthful behaviors can amplify genetic risk seem to be especially motivating of behavioral risk-reduction efforts.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsSunburnAdultFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHealth BehaviorHumansMaleSunscreening AgentsSunscreening AgentsFamilial melanomaGene-behavior interactionGenetic counselingGenetic determinismPerceived controlSun-protection behaviors

Identifiers

PMID35179177
PMCPMC9345182
OpenAlexW4213200503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.