ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Role of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Optimizing Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention according to lesion complexity.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Trial
- Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guided by High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound (The SPECTRUM Study).Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Observational
- Intracoronary imaging in percutaneous coronary intervention: why, when, how and which from large, randomized trials.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Elevated lipoprotein(a) and adverse outcomes in advanced coronary artery calcification: An intravascular ultrasound study.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Plaque Characterization: Clinical Implications, Evidence Gaps, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Twenty-Year Clinical Experience of the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.Korean circulation journal · 2025Review
- Intravascular imaging for acute coronary syndrome.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- Intravascular ULTRA sound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI: Rationale and design of the ULTRA-STEMI trial.World journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: Results from Big Data Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Microcatheter selective injection technique using ultra low contrast for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with previous acute kidney injury: a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on the Management of Patients With STEMI Referred for Primary PCI.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Review
- Intracoronary imaging guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions: how and when to apply validated metrics to improve the outcome.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Review
- Five-year follow-up of OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- Racial/Ethnic, Sex, and Economic Disparities in the Utilization and Outcomes of Intracoronary Imaging.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prognostic Importance of Fractional Flow Reserve and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.JACC. Asia · 2024Article
- Effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome-propensity score matching analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still unclear in patients with acute myocardial infarction acute myocardial infarction. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term impact of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results Among a total of 13 104 patients with acute myocardial infarction, enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health, we selected patients who underwent PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. The primary outcome was the risk of target lesion failure at 3 years. Among the study population, 1887 patients (21.0%) underwent IVUS-guidance, and 7120 patients (79.0%) underwent angiography-guidance for second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of target lesion failure at 3 years (4.8% versus 8.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.73;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.