Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35178874›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2022

Fishing for DNA? Designing baits for population genetics in target enrichment experiments: Guidelines, considerations and the new tool supeRbaits.

Belén Jiménez-Mena, Hugo Flávio, Romina Henriques, Alice Manuzzi, Miguel Ramos, Dorte Meldrup, Janette Edson, Snaebjörn Pálsson, Guðbjörg Ásta Ólafsdóttir, Jennifer R Ovenden and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. OLTA: Optimizing bait seLection for TArgeted sequencing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Belén Jiménez-MenaSection for Marine Living Resources, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Silkeborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8458-5533
Hugo FlávioSection for Marine Living Resources, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Silkeborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5174-1197
Romina HenriquesSection for Marine Living Resources, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Silkeborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6544-5532
Alice ManuzziSection for Marine Living Resources, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Silkeborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8116-9710
Miguel RamosDCC-FCUP, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1211-4270
Dorte MeldrupSection for Marine Living Resources, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Janette EdsonQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1864-0095
Snaebjörn PálssonFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-3500
Guðbjörg Ásta ÓlafsdóttirResearch Centre of the Westfjords, University of Iceland, Bolungarvik, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2814-9160
Jennifer R OvendenMolecular Fisheries Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7538-1504
Einar Eg NielsenSection for Marine Living Resources, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Silkeborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7009-9814
Technical University of Denmark · DKThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Iceland · ISUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

Australian Research Grant DP170102043Innovationsfonden: Udvikling af den danske laksebestand - større populationer, genetiske ressourcer og rekreativt fiskeri" "SDPASThe Danish Council for Independent Research Grant DFF 6108-00583The Icelandic Research Fund "CODSTORY"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted sequencing is an increasingly popular next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach for studying populations that involves focusing sequencing efforts on specific parts of the genome of a species of interest. Methodologies and tools for designing targeted baits are scarce but in high demand. Here, we present specific guidelines and considerations for designing capture sequencing experiments for population genetics for both neutral genomic regions and regions subject to selection. We describe the bait design process for three diverse fish species: Atlantic salmon, Atlantic cod and tiger shark, which was carried out in our research group, and provide an evaluation of the performance of our approach across both historical and modern samples. The workflow used for designing these three bait sets has been implemented in the R-package supeRbaits, which encompasses our considerations and guidelines for bait design for the benefit of researchers and practitioners. The supeRbaits R-package is user-friendly and versatile. It is written in C++ and implemented in R. supeRbaits and its manual are available from Github: https://github.com/BelenJM/supeRbaits.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsDNAFishesGenetics, PopulationGenomicsSequence Analysis, DNADNAancient DNAbaitscapture sequencinggenomicspopulation geneticsR-package

Identifiers

PMID35178874
PMCPMC9313901
OpenAlexW4220818824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.