ReviewThe Journal of eukaryotic microbiology2022
Macronuclear development in ciliates, with a focus on nuclear architecture.
Review in The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-assembling proteins compose the chemically resistant shell biomaterial of planktonic tintinnid ciliates.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Evolution and ecology of commensal gut protists: recent advances.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025Review
- Genome content reorganization in the non-model ciliatemSphere · 2025Article
- Genome content in the non-model ciliatebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Exploring the biogeography, morphology, and phylogeny of the condylostomatid ciliates (Alveolata, Ciliophora, Heterotrichea), with establishment of four newMarine life science & technology · 2024Article
- Giants' cooperation: a draft genome of the giant ciliateMicrobial genomics · 2024Article
- Integrative analyses on the ciliatesmSystems · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ciliates are defined by the presence of dimorphic nuclei as they have both a somatic macronucleus and germline micronucleus within each individual cell. The size and structure of both germline micronuclei and somatic macronuclei vary tremendously among ciliates. Except just after conjugation (i.e. the nuclear exchange in their life cycle), the germline micronucleus is transcriptionally inactive and contains canonical chromosomes that will be inherited between generations. In contrast, the transcriptionally active macronucleus contains chromosomes that vary in size in different classes of ciliates, with some lineages having extensively fragmented gene-sized somatic chromosomes while others contain longer multigene chromosomes. Here, we describe the variation in somatic macronuclear architecture in lineages sampled across the ciliate tree of life, specifically focusing on lineages with extensively fragmented chromosomes (e.g. the classes Phyllopharyngea and Spirotrichea). Further, we synthesize information from the literature on the development of ciliate macronuclei, focusing on changes in nuclear architecture throughout life cycles. These data highlight the tremendous diversity among ciliate nuclear cycles, extend our understanding of patterns of genome evolution, and provide insight into different germline and somatic nuclear features (e.g. nuclear structure and development) among eukaryotes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.